Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FEDERATED RANCH AND BROKERAGE INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, 3:13-cv-4718-VC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140801d66 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED ANSWER VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Plaintiff Federated Ranch and Brokerage International, Inc. ("Federated") and Peerless Insurance Company ("Peerless"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, Federated filed a Complaint in Contra Costa County Superior Court on September 9, 2013; WHEREAS, Peerless filed its Answer to Federated's Complaint in Contra Costa Co
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED ANSWER

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

Plaintiff Federated Ranch and Brokerage International, Inc. ("Federated") and Peerless Insurance Company ("Peerless"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, Federated filed a Complaint in Contra Costa County Superior Court on September 9, 2013;

WHEREAS, Peerless filed its Answer to Federated's Complaint in Contra Costa County Superior Court on October 9, 2013, and subsequently removed the case to United States District Court for the Northern District of California on October 10, 2013;

WHEREAS, Peerless filed a Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer on July 14, 2014 (ECF No. 27);

WHEREAS, Peerless' proposed First Amended Answer, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, adds and revises affirmative defenses, includes detailed responses to the allegations in the complaint rather than a general denial, and corrects typographical errors and other edits;

WHEREAS, a hearing on Peerless' Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer is set for August 28, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. (ECF No. 28);

WHEREAS, subsequent to the filing of Peerless' Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer, Federated agreed to stipulate that Peerless may file its proposed First Amended Answer.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Peerless be allowed to file a First Amended Answer. A copy of Peerless' proposed First Amended Answer is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that if Peerless is granted leave to file the proposed First Amended Answer, Peerless' Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer (ECF No. 27) will be rendered moot and should be withdrawn, and the hearing currently set for August 28, 2014 should be taken off calendar. Peerless will file a separate Notice of Withdrawal of its Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer.

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS ORDERED that:

Peerless is granted leave to file the first amended answer attached as Exhibit A to the parties' Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Leave to File First Amended Answer.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer