Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

VAN DUSEN v. CITY OF OAKLAND, 13-cv-05023-VC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140801d76 Visitors: 28
Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. The plaintiff is ordered to serve all remaining defendants by September 2, 2014. The plaintiff is further ordered to file a brief of no more than 15 pages addressing the question whether all or part of her lawsuit should be dismissed under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). This brief is due September 15, 2014. Any defendant may file a response of no more than 15 pages by September 29, 2014. The plaintiff may file a reply of no more than 10 pages b
More

ORDER

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

The plaintiff is ordered to serve all remaining defendants by September 2, 2014. The plaintiff is further ordered to file a brief of no more than 15 pages addressing the question whether all or part of her lawsuit should be dismissed under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). This brief is due September 15, 2014. Any defendant may file a response of no more than 15 pages by September 29, 2014. The plaintiff may file a reply of no more than 10 pages by October 6, 2014. A hearing on whether the case should be dismissed in whole or in part under Heck is scheduled for October 16, 2014 at 10 a.m. The Court will notify the parties in advance if it determines that a hearing is unnecessary for purposes of deciding this question. Aside from service of the remaining defendants and litigating the question whether the case should be dismissed in whole or in part under Heck, the case remains stayed. The defendants are not required to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint while the stay remains in place.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer