Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER RE: DISCOVERY AND SEALING MOTIONS (Re: Docket Nos. 209, 210, 218, 221, 223, 229, 232, 235, 236 and 249) PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge. In light of the parties' representations that they will meet and confer to address the discovery disputes pending before the court and that letter briefs to be filed on August 6th "will supersede and render moot" Docket Nos. 209, 218, 221, 223, 232 and 235, the court DENIES those motions AS MOOT. 1 The court further rules as follows on the outstandin
Summary: ORDER RE: DISCOVERY AND SEALING MOTIONS (Re: Docket Nos. 209, 210, 218, 221, 223, 229, 232, 235, 236 and 249) PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge. In light of the parties' representations that they will meet and confer to address the discovery disputes pending before the court and that letter briefs to be filed on August 6th "will supersede and render moot" Docket Nos. 209, 218, 221, 223, 232 and 235, the court DENIES those motions AS MOOT. 1 The court further rules as follows on the outstanding..
More
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY AND SEALING MOTIONS (Re: Docket Nos. 209, 210, 218, 221, 223, 229, 232, 235, 236 and 249)
PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge.
In light of the parties' representations that they will meet and confer to address the discovery disputes pending before the court and that letter briefs to be filed on August 6th "will supersede and render moot" Docket Nos. 209, 218, 221, 223, 232 and 235, the court DENIES those motions AS MOOT.1
The court further rules as follows on the outstanding sealing motions:
DN RULING
210-4 Page 1, ¶ 2 May be filed under seal.
Page 1, ¶ 3 May not be filed under seal.
Page 1, ¶ 4 May not be filed under seal.
Page 2, ¶ 2 May not be filed under seal.
(first full ¶)
Page 2, ¶ 3 May not be filed under seal.
(second full ¶)
Page 2, ¶ 4 May not be filed under seal.
(partial ¶)
Page 3, ¶ 1 May be filed under seal.
(partial ¶)
Page 3, ¶ 2 May be filed under seal.
(first full ¶)
Page 3, ¶ 3 May be filed under seal.
(second full ¶)
Page 3, ¶ 4 May be filed under seal.
(third full ¶)
DN 210-5, Only the customer names, numerical reference to the number of
Ex. A customers and the description of contract language may be filed
under seal. The additional proposed redactions are neither
narrowly-tailored nor well supported as required by the local
rules.2
DN 210-6, May not be filed under seal. The proposed redactions are neither
Ex. B narrowly-tailored nor well supported as required by the local
rules.
DN 210-7, May not be filed under seal. The proposed redactions are neither
Ex. C narrowly-tailored nor well supported as required by the local
rules.
DN 210-8, May not be filed under seal. The proposed redactions are neither
Ex. D narrowly-tailored nor well supported as required by the local
rules.
DN 210-9, Only the customer information may be filed under seal. The
Ex. E additional proposed redactions are neither narrowly-tailored nor
well supported as required by the local rules.
DN 229, Only the customer names, redacted e-mail addresses, user IDs and
Exs. A-I direct quotes from referenced contracts may be filed under seal.
The additional proposed redactions are neither narrowly-tailored
nor well supported as required by the local rules.
DN 236-4 Only the single customer name and any numerical reference to the
number of customers may be filed under seal. The additional
proposed redactions are neither narrowly-tailored nor well
supported as required by the local rules.
DN 249-4 Only the customer names, redacted e-mail addresses, user IDs and
direct quotes from referenced contracts may be filed under seal.
The additional proposed redactions are neither narrowly-tailored
nor well supported as required by the local rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
