Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BOSNAK v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CV 14-01429JSC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140806798
Filed: Aug. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff Gregg S. Bosnak originally filed this action on March 28, 2014. At the time, he requested leave to proceed In Forma Pauperis. On March 31, 2014, the Court issued an initial scheduling Order, which, among other things, set a case management conference for August 14, 2014. On April 14, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiff's application to proceed In Forma Pauperis. On May 15, 2014, t
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Gregg S. Bosnak originally filed this action on March 28, 2014. At the time, he requested leave to proceed In Forma Pauperis. On March 31, 2014, the Court issued an initial scheduling Order, which, among other things, set a case management conference for August 14, 2014. On April 14, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiff's application to proceed In Forma Pauperis.

On May 15, 2014, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint sua sponte, with leave to file an amended Complaint. On June 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint (FAC). On June 30, 2014, the Court entered an Order to Issue Summons. The Court issued the Summons on July 10, 2014 to the United States Marshall's Office. The United States Marshall's Office served the Summons and FAC on Defendant City and County of San Francisco, including its constituent department Laguna Honda Hospital and Rehabilitation Center, on July 21, 2014. The City's response to the FAC currently is due on or before August 11, 2014.

Given the delay in service, the parties have not had sufficient time to satisfy the requirements of the initial scheduling order such as compliance with the meet and confer requirements under Federal Rule 26(f) or ADR certification under Civil Local Rule 16-8(b). Nor are the parties prepared to prepare and file a joint case management conference statement by August 7, 2014 as required by the scheduling order.

According, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, that:

1. The City shall have an extension of time up to and including September 2, 2014 to respond the First Amended Complaint;

2. The August 14, 2014 case management be continued 77-days to October 30, 2014, or as soon thereafter as the conference may be scheduled, to provide the parties with additional time to prepare for the initial case management conference. The parties further seek a corresponding extension of the other dates set forth in the March 31, 2014 initial scheduling order. STIP. AND The parties respectfully request that the Court enter an order commemorating this stipulation.

GRANTED.

FootNotes


1. The City's counsel obtain the consent of plaintiff's counsel to the filing of this stipulation and proposed order.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer