Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pacific Coast Shipyards Pension Fund v. Nautical Engineering, Inc., 3:12-cv-05439 RS (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140820c61 Visitors: 21
Filed: Aug. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiffs PACIFIC COAST SHIPYARDS PENSION FUND, MARINE CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, I.B.E.W. PACIFIC COAST PENSION FUND (collectively, the "Pension Funds"), together with the respective trustees of each Pension Fund (collectively, the "Plaintiffs"), and URSULA ESTEVES, THE ESTEVES FAMILY TRUST, and URSULA MARY ESTEVES AS TRUSTEE OF THE E
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiffs PACIFIC COAST SHIPYARDS PENSION FUND, MARINE CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, I.B.E.W. PACIFIC COAST PENSION FUND (collectively, the "Pension Funds"), together with the respective trustees of each Pension Fund (collectively, the "Plaintiffs"), and URSULA ESTEVES, THE ESTEVES FAMILY TRUST, and URSULA MARY ESTEVES AS TRUSTEE OF THE ESTEVES FAMILY TRUST (collectively, the "Esteves Defendants"), stipulate and agree, by and through their respective counsel, that the above-referenced action is hereby dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, with respect to all claims asserted against the Esteves Defendants. Except as may be agreed by the parties, each party shall bear his, her or its own attorney's fees and costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

I attest that I have obtained Mr. Carroll's concurrence in the filing of this document.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer