Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CHAVEZ v. U.S., 13-04532 VC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140827840 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO RELEASE AUTOPSY PHOTOGRAPHS; [PROPOSED] ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. WHEREAS, this action concerns the death of Natasha Carmen Carmona Coleman ("Decedent"), who was a mother of Plaintiff and wife of Defendant Nathaniel Coleman; WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office/Coroner's Division conducted an autopsy of Decedent; WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office/Coroner's Division has informed Defendant that it possesses one or more photographs o
More

STIPULATION TO RELEASE AUTOPSY PHOTOGRAPHS; [PROPOSED] ORDER

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

WHEREAS, this action concerns the death of Natasha Carmen Carmona Coleman ("Decedent"), who was a mother of Plaintiff and wife of Defendant Nathaniel Coleman;

WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office/Coroner's Division conducted an autopsy of Decedent;

WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office/Coroner's Division has informed Defendant that it possesses one or more photographs of Decedent taken pursuant to the autopsy;

WHEREAS, the parties believe that the photograph(s) of Decedent possessed by the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office/Coroner's Division are reasonably likely to be relevant to the claims and defenses in this action;

WHEREAS, the parties wish to obtain the photograph(s) of Decedent possessed by the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office/Coroner's Division;

WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office/Coroner's Division has informed Defendant that it requires a Court order to release any photograph(s) of Decedent in its possession;

THEREFORE, subject to the approval of the Court, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

The Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office/Coroner's Division shall release any and all photographs of Decedent in its possession to the parties in this case upon written request.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. I, Rebecca A. Falk, hereby attest, in accordance with the Civil L.R. 5(i)(3), the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory listed here.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer