TITUS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, C13-02401 JST. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140827848
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. Nos. 32-34); [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. This matter is presently set on September 25, 2014 for hearing on Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint (Dkt. Nos. 32-34). Defendants opposed this motion on the grounds of prejudice due to the possibility of re-opening discovery. (Dkt. No. 37.) The parties have met and conferred and agreed to the following: Defendants agree to withdraw their objection
Summary: STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. Nos. 32-34); [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. This matter is presently set on September 25, 2014 for hearing on Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint (Dkt. Nos. 32-34). Defendants opposed this motion on the grounds of prejudice due to the possibility of re-opening discovery. (Dkt. No. 37.) The parties have met and conferred and agreed to the following: Defendants agree to withdraw their objection t..
More
STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. Nos. 32-34); [PROPOSED] ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
This matter is presently set on September 25, 2014 for hearing on Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint (Dkt. Nos. 32-34). Defendants opposed this motion on the grounds of prejudice due to the possibility of re-opening discovery. (Dkt. No. 37.)
The parties have met and conferred and agreed to the following:
Defendants agree to withdraw their objection to the filing of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint as presented as an attachment to Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. No. 34-1).
Plaintiff agrees not to seek to reopen either fact or expert discovery in this case.
Both parties agree that the filing of the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 34-1) will not affect the deadlines set by Judge Tigar in his scheduling order (Dkt. No. 23).
SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Court grants leave to Plaintiff to file his amended complaint (Dkt. No. 34-1) by August 29, 2014. Defendants shall answer such amended complaint by September 2, 2014. All dates in the original scheduling order (Dkt. No. 23) will remain in place. Fact and expert discovery will remain closed.
Source: Leagle
