STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on July 10, 2014, the Court entered an Order Denying Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss and Granting the Pioneer Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Leave to Amend (MDL Dkt. 1344);

WHEREAS, on July 30, 2014, plaintiffs Acer America Corporation, Gateway, Inc., and Gateway U.S. Retail, Inc., f/k/a eMachines, Inc. (collectively, "Acer") filed a Second Amended Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief (MDL Dkt. 1361);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Joint Stipulation and Order Regarding Defendants' Responses to Second Amended Complaint entered by this Court on July 18, 2014 (MDL Dkt. 1351), Defendants' responses to Acer's Second Amended Complaint are currently due August 29, 2014; and

WHEREAS, defendants Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation ("TSSTK"), Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation ("TSST"), Toshiba Corporation ("Toshiba Corp."), and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. ("TAIS") are continuing to review their Answers to Acer's Second Amended Complaint, and Acer has agreed that TSSTK, TSST, Toshiba Corp. and TAIS shall have an additional week, until September 5, 2014, to file their respective Answers.

It is therefore STIPULATED and AGREED, subject to Court approval, that:

Defendants TSSTK, TSST, Toshiba Corp. and TAIS shall have until September 5, 2014 to file their respective Answers to Acer's Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.