Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brady v. Von Drehle Corporation, 3:14-cv-1732-VC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140903e99 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION AND PROPOSED] ORDER DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. WHEREAS, Defendant von Drehle Corporation ("Defendant") filed a motion to transfer on July 18, 2014, noticing a hearing for August 28, 2014 (ECF No. 30); WHEREAS, Plaintiff James Brady's ("Plaintiff') opposition is due on August 1, 2014, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3(a); WHEREAS, Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to oppose the motion due to counsel's unavoidable conflicts
More

STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION AND PROPOSED] ORDER DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

WHEREAS, Defendant von Drehle Corporation ("Defendant") filed a motion to transfer on July 18, 2014, noticing a hearing for August 28, 2014 (ECF No. 30);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff James Brady's ("Plaintiff') opposition is due on August 1, 2014, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3(a);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to oppose the motion due to counsel's unavoidable conflicts in other litigation matters;

WHEREAS, Defendant does not object to the requested extension;

WHEREAS, even with the requested extension, the Court will have the standard two-week period between the reply brief and the hearing;

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate to the following briefing schedule related to Defendant's motion to transfer (ECF No. 30):

Plaintiff's Opposition pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3(a) shall be filed no later than August 7, 2014, and

Defendant's Reply pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3(c) shall be filed no later than August 14, 2014.33673367468453808

SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer