Carnes v. Atria Senior Living, Inc., 3:14-cv-02727-VC. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140904871
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY PLAN [Civil L.R. 6-1(a)] VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties hereby provide notice of their stipulation to extend the time for exchanging initial disclosures. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1), the parties must make their initial disclosures and submit a written report outlining their proposed discovery plan within 14 days after holding thei
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY PLAN [Civil L.R. 6-1(a)] VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties hereby provide notice of their stipulation to extend the time for exchanging initial disclosures. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1), the parties must make their initial disclosures and submit a written report outlining their proposed discovery plan within 14 days after holding their..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY PLAN
[Civil L.R. 6-1(a)]
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties hereby provide notice of their stipulation to extend the time for exchanging initial disclosures. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1), the parties must make their initial disclosures and submit a written report outlining their proposed discovery plan within 14 days after holding their Rule 26(f) conference, "unless a different time is set by stipulation or court order." The parties held their Rule 26(f) conference on August 20, 2104, and stipulated that they would make their initial disclosures and submit their proposed discovery plan on September 17, 2014. This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DECLARATION OF CONSENT
I, JEFFREY S. RANEN, hereby declare pursuant to General Order 45, § X(B), that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from Kathryn A. Stebner.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 27, 2014, in the City of Los Angeles, California.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
