CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
WHEREAS Defendant The Hershey Company ("Hershey") filed its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (the "Motion"), Dkt. 150, on August 12, 2014;
WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed their Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Motion and simultaneously also requested relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d), Dkt. 176, on September 3, 2014,
WHEREAS counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel for Defendant have conferred, and Plaintiffs have no objection to allowing Hershey to file a twenty-page reply in support of its Motion, of which no more than fifteen (15) pages may be dedicated to a reply in support of the merits of the Motion, including objections on evidence, if any, and no more than five (5) pages may be dedicated to opposing Plaintiffs' separate request for relief under Rule 56(d).
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 & 7-12 by and between the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record, that Hershey may exceed the fifteen-page limit set by Local Rule 7-4 and file a twenty-page reply in support of the Motion, on the terms described above.
Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Christopher D. Havener, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, and for good cause showing, the Court shall permit Defendant The Hershey Company to file a twenty (20) page Reply In Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, of which no more than fifteen (15) pages may be dedicated to a reply in support of the merits of the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, including objections on evidence, if any, and five (5) pages may be dedicated to opposing Plaintiffs' separate request for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d).
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.