SVENSON v. GOOGLE INC., CV-13-04080-BLF. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140915379
Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF SEEKING RELIEF FROM HEARING REQUIREMENTS BETH L. FREEMAN, District Judge. STIPULATION Defendants Google Inc. and Google Payment Corporation ("Defendants") and Plaintiff Alice Svenson ("Plaintiff"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to, and respectfully ask the Court to grant Defendants' Motion for Administrative Relief Seeking Relief From Hearing Requirements ("Motion for Administrat
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF SEEKING RELIEF FROM HEARING REQUIREMENTS BETH L. FREEMAN, District Judge. STIPULATION Defendants Google Inc. and Google Payment Corporation ("Defendants") and Plaintiff Alice Svenson ("Plaintiff"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to, and respectfully ask the Court to grant Defendants' Motion for Administrative Relief Seeking Relief From Hearing Requirements ("Motion for Administrati..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF SEEKING RELIEF FROM HEARING REQUIREMENTS
BETH L. FREEMAN, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Defendants Google Inc. and Google Payment Corporation ("Defendants") and Plaintiff Alice Svenson ("Plaintiff"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to, and respectfully ask the Court to grant Defendants' Motion for Administrative Relief Seeking Relief From Hearing Requirements ("Motion for Administrative Relief"), and to enter the attached Proposed Order.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court, having considered Defendants' Motion for Administrative Relief and the Stipulation of the parties, hereby ORDERS as follows:
1. Defendants' Motion for Administrative Relief is hereby GRANTED.
2. The hearing date for Defendants' Motion to Vacate Scheduling Order and Stay Discovery (January 15, 2015) is hereby STRUCK.
3. The Court will consider Defendants' Motion to Vacate Scheduling Order and Stay Discovery in accordance with LCR 7-3 once the parties have filed all papers in support of and in opposition thereto.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
