Genentech, Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 4:11-cv-02410-JSW. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140923977
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2014
Summary: STIPULATED CONSENT JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a settlement and have agreed that Apotex Inc. shall be enjoined as set forth below, that the parties will dismiss with prejudice all claims and counterclaims asserted in this action, and that each party shall bear its own costs, Accordingly, by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, it is ORDERED: 1. Apote
Summary: STIPULATED CONSENT JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a settlement and have agreed that Apotex Inc. shall be enjoined as set forth below, that the parties will dismiss with prejudice all claims and counterclaims asserted in this action, and that each party shall bear its own costs, Accordingly, by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, it is ORDERED: 1. Apotex..
More
STIPULATED CONSENT JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a settlement and have agreed that Apotex Inc. shall be enjoined as set forth below, that the parties will dismiss with prejudice all claims and counterclaims asserted in this action, and that each party shall bear its own costs,
Accordingly, by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, it is ORDERED:
1. Apotex Inc., its officers, agents, servants and employees, and all those acting in concert with them, are permanently enjoined from making, having made, using, selling or offering for sale in the United States, or importing into the United States, valganciclovir hydrochloride oral tablets described in Abbreviated New Drug Application No. 202785 and any supplements or amendments thereto, prior to September 30, 2015 except in accordance with a license granted by the Plaintiffs.
2. All claims and counterclaims asserted in this action are dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
