Filed: Sep. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. WHEREAS, on June 13, 2014, the U.S. Securities and Exhange Commission (the "Commission") filed the Complaint against Defendants Saleem Khan, Ammar Akbari, Roshanlal Chaganlal and Ranjan Mendonsa (collectively, the "Defendants"), and the Commission has since filed proof of service, or waiver of service, with respect to all of the Defendants;
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. WHEREAS, on June 13, 2014, the U.S. Securities and Exhange Commission (the "Commission") filed the Complaint against Defendants Saleem Khan, Ammar Akbari, Roshanlal Chaganlal and Ranjan Mendonsa (collectively, the "Defendants"), and the Commission has since filed proof of service, or waiver of service, with respect to all of the Defendants; ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2014, the U.S. Securities and Exhange Commission (the "Commission") filed the Complaint against Defendants Saleem Khan, Ammar Akbari, Roshanlal Chaganlal and Ranjan Mendonsa (collectively, the "Defendants"), and the Commission has since filed proof of service, or waiver of service, with respect to all of the Defendants;
WHEREAS, pursuant to prior Stipulations entered between the Commission and each of the Defendants separately extending the time to file an Answer to the Complaint, each of the Defendants are currently required to file an Answer on or before September 11, 2014;
WHEREAS, no other time modifications have been made in this case;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's Case Management Conference Order entered July 21, 2014 (Dkt No. 21), the parties are required to attend the initial Case Management Conference in this matter on September 18, 2014 at 9:30 a.m., and to file a joint Case Management Statement one week prior to the CMC;
WHEREAS, counsel for the Commission has a conflict with the currently scheduled initial CMC, due to a previously scheduled annual conference that takes place in Washington, D.C.;
WHEREAS, counsel for the Commission has been speaking with counsel for certain of the defendants to determine whether there may be any opportunity for an early resolution of this matter;
ACCORDINGLY, it is HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned parties that:
1. The Parties jointly request that each of the above dates be extended for approximately 30 days, resulting in:
a. The initial Case Management Conference shall be moved to Thursday, October 16, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. (or as soon thereafter as the Court's schedule shall allow);
b. The initial Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than October 9, 2014;
c. The Defendants' Answers to the Complaint are each due to be filed on or before October 13, 2014;
2. In all other respects aside from these deadlines, the parties shall adhere to the terms of the Court's Case Management Conference Order and their respective Stipulations.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Good cause appearing from the above Stipulation, the requested extension of approximately 30 days for the Parties to appear before the Court for the initial Case Management Conference and related filings, and extending the time for each of the Defendants to file an Answer to the Complaint, is hereby GRANTED.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
a. The initial Case Management Conference shall be moved to Thursday, October 16, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. (or as soon thereafter as the Court's schedule shall allow);
b. The initial Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than October 9, 2014;
c. The Defendants' respective Answers to the Complaint are each due to be filed on or before October 13, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
