Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

KING v. TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL, INC., 3:14-cv-00693. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140924d69 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION CONSENTING TO JURISDICTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND STAYING JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS PENDING COMPLETION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON NATHANEAL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Nathan King and Defendant The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership (erroneously sued as Terminix International, Inc.), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On February 13, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this Court
More

STIPULATION CONSENTING TO JURISDICTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND STAYING JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS PENDING COMPLETION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

NATHANEAL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Nathan King and Defendant The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership (erroneously sued as Terminix International, Inc.), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On February 13, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this Court, commencing the above-referenced judicial action, which has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins;

2. In accordance with Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the undersigned parties hereby voluntarily consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the event that an appeal is filed.

3. The parties entered into and are bound by a mandatory dispute resolution process known as the ServiceMaster We Listen Dispute Resolution Plan, 2012 revision ("We Listen"), signed by Plaintiff on July 18, 2012;

4. The We Listen process requires submission of the claims at issue in this case to mediation and, if necessary, final and binding arbitration;

5. The parties agree that this action should be stayed pending completion of the We Listen process, including, if necessary final and binding arbitration, and that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter pending conclusion of the We Listen process.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that:

1. Plaintiff Nathan King shall submit his claims at issue in this judicial action to mediation and, if necessary, final and binding arbitration pursuant to the We Listen process;

2. Plaintiff's action is hereby stayed pending completion of the We Listen process;

3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter pending conclusion of the We Listen process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer