Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

AMBUHL v. SAP LABS, LLC, 5:13-cv-04866-RMW. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140925a12 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ ] ORDER REGARDING ADR RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Plaintiff Elizabeth Ambuhl ("Plaintiff") and Defendant SAP Lab, LLC ("Defendant"), the parties to the above-entitled action (collectively referred to herein as the "Parties"), submit this Stipulation to the Court: STIPULATION WHEREAS, on March 14, 2014, the Parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process in the above-entitled action, in which the Parties agreed to participate in an Early Neutral
More

STIPULATION AND [ ] ORDER REGARDING ADR

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Elizabeth Ambuhl ("Plaintiff") and Defendant SAP Lab, LLC ("Defendant"), the parties to the above-entitled action (collectively referred to herein as the "Parties"), submit this Stipulation to the Court:

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, on March 14, 2014, the Parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process in the above-entitled action, in which the Parties agreed to participate in an Early Neutral Evaluation, Dkt. No. 26;

WHEREAS, on March 28, 2014, the Court issued an Order Selecting ADR Process in the above-entitled action, approving of the stipulation between the Parties to participate in an Early Neutral Evaluation, Dkt. No. 27, (the "Order");

WHEREAS, the appointed Evaluator, Stephen D. Pahl, contacted the Parties for the first time on July 29, 2014, regarding the Early Neutral Evaluation for this case;

WHEREAS, the Parties have decided to engage in private mediation with mediator Jeffery Ross and have a mediation scheduled for September 25, 2014;

WHEREAS, for good cause and to promote settlement and avoid prejudice that would result to both Parties if they were not allowed to participate in private mediation;

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their undersigned respective counsel, stipulate and request that:

1) The Court approve the Parties participation in private mediation with Jeffery Ross, rather than the previously stipulated Early Neutral Evaluation process;

2) The Court remove this matter from the Court's ADR program; and

3) The Court extend the deadline to participate in ADR to September 30, 2014, to allow the Parties to participate in private mediation on September 25, 2014.

4) To avoid prejudice to both Parties, good cause exists to modify the Order as described herein.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

In light of the foregoing Stipulation of the Parties above and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS the following:

1) The Court approves the Parties participation in private mediation with Jeffery Ross, rather than the previously stipulated Early Neutral Evaluation process;

2) This matter is removed from the Court's ADR program; and

3) The deadline for the Parties to participate in ADR is extended to September 30, 2014, to allow the Parties to participate in private mediation on September 25, 2014.

4) To avoid prejudice to both Parties, good cause exists to modify the Court's Order as described herein.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer