Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rodman v. Safeway Inc., 3:11-CV-03003-JST (JCS). (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140930a32 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, plaintiff Michael M. Rodman ("Plaintiff") and defendant Safeway Inc. ("Safeway" and, collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel, stipulate as follows: 1. The parties, pursuant to the case management schedule, filed cross motions for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 171) and summary judgment (E
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, plaintiff Michael M. Rodman ("Plaintiff") and defendant Safeway Inc. ("Safeway" and, collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. The parties, pursuant to the case management schedule, filed cross motions for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 171) and summary judgment (ECF No. 173) on July 18, 2014, and opposition briefs on August 11, 2014 (ECF Nos. 183 and 187) (collectively the "Cross-Motions"). The Court heard argument on the Cross-Motions on September 11, 2014. ECF No. 198.

2. Following argument on the Cross-Motions, the Court ordered supplemental briefing on the issue of unconscionability with opening briefs due on Wednesday, October 1, 2014 and response briefs, if any, due on Wednesday, October 15, 2014 (ECF No. 200).

3. Lead defense counsel has suffered a death in his family and will be unavailable for next few days. In light of this, the parties have agreed, subject to the Court's approval, that the supplemental briefing schedule should be extended two days so that opening briefs will be due on Friday, October 3, 2014 and response briefs, if any, will be due Friday, October 17, 2014.

4. The parties have not previously sought an extension of the submission deadlines for the supplemental briefing discussed above. This brief extension will not adversely impact or delay the case schedule.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Having considered the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, the Court orders the following briefing schedule for Supplemental Briefing Re Unconscionability:

a. Opening Briefs due October 3, 2014;

b. Response Briefs, if any, due October 17, 2014

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer