Filed: Sep. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS [Local Rule 6-2] CHARLES R. BREYER, Senior District Judge. The parties to the above captioned matter hereby stipulate by and through their undersigned counsel to the following: On September 8, 2014, Defendants Debra LaPalm, Lisa Grote, Susan Loftus and Shawn Mason filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. At the same time, Defendant City of San Mateo also filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Moreover,
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS [Local Rule 6-2] CHARLES R. BREYER, Senior District Judge. The parties to the above captioned matter hereby stipulate by and through their undersigned counsel to the following: On September 8, 2014, Defendants Debra LaPalm, Lisa Grote, Susan Loftus and Shawn Mason filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. At the same time, Defendant City of San Mateo also filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Moreover, a..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS [Local Rule 6-2]
CHARLES R. BREYER, Senior District Judge.
The parties to the above captioned matter hereby stipulate by and through their undersigned counsel to the following:
On September 8, 2014, Defendants Debra LaPalm, Lisa Grote, Susan Loftus and Shawn Mason filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. At the same time, Defendant City of San Mateo also filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Moreover, all of these moving Defendants collectively filed a Motion to Strike certain paragraphs of Plaintiffs' Complaint. These Motions are currently set for hearing on October 31, 2014.
Plaintiffs filed their Oppositions to these three Motions on September 22, 2014.
Defendants' Reply Briefs in support of the three Motions are currently due on September 29, 2014.
Over the weekend of September 27-28, 2014, counsel for Defendants, Katherine Alberts, was incapacitated due to a severe migraine, and was unable to work on Defendants' Reply Briefs. Given the early stages of this case, Ms. Alberts is the only counsel familiar enough with the issues to draft the Reply Briefs. Due to the loss of two days time to work on the Reply Briefs, Ms. Alberts requested, and Plaintiffs' counsel agreed to, a one day extension of time for Defendants to file their Reply Briefs to the three Motions.
The parties request that the Court grant Defendants a one day extension of time to file their Reply Briefs in support of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Motion to Strike, such that those Reply Briefs must be filed and served on Tuesday, September 30, 2014.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties and good cause showing, Defendants City of San Mateo, Debra LaPalm, Susan Loftus, Lisa Grote and Shawn Mason are hereby granted a one day extension of time to file their Reply Briefs in support of their respective Motions to Dismiss and Motion to Strike. Defendants shall file their Reply Briefs on Tuesday, September 30, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
