U.S. v. ACTS REVIVAL CENTER, 13-CV-01542-LHK. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140930e41
Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER REGARDING EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. On September 29, 2014, Leila Sockolov sent the attached e-mail to Courtroom Deputy Stacy Sakamoto requesting that the Court advise as to whether the parties in this case may agree amongst themselves to take a deposition after the existing discovery cutoff date, or whether they needed an order from the Court to do so.This is an ex parte communication with the Court. It is prohibited by Civil Local Rule 11-4(c) and will be disr
Summary: ORDER REGARDING EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. On September 29, 2014, Leila Sockolov sent the attached e-mail to Courtroom Deputy Stacy Sakamoto requesting that the Court advise as to whether the parties in this case may agree amongst themselves to take a deposition after the existing discovery cutoff date, or whether they needed an order from the Court to do so.This is an ex parte communication with the Court. It is prohibited by Civil Local Rule 11-4(c) and will be disre..
More
ORDER REGARDING EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
On September 29, 2014, Leila Sockolov sent the attached e-mail to Courtroom Deputy Stacy Sakamoto requesting that the Court advise as to whether the parties in this case may agree amongst themselves to take a deposition after the existing discovery cutoff date, or whether they needed an order from the Court to do so.This is an ex parte communication with the Court. It is prohibited by Civil Local Rule 11-4(c) and will be disregarded as such.
The only e-mail communications that the parties are allowed to have with the Courtroom Deputy are non-substantive scheduling communications and must include opposing counsel. All substantive issues must be discussed in filings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
