Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 07-5944 SC (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141014956 Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WRITTEN DISCOVERY SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. Defendants Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. De C.V., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. (collectively, "SDI") and plaintiffs Tech Data Corporation and Tech Data Product Management, Inc. (collectively, "Tech Data") have conferred by and through their counsel and, subject
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WRITTEN DISCOVERY

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

Defendants Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., Samsung SDI Mexico S.A. De C.V., Samsung SDI Brasil Ltda., Shenzen Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. (collectively, "SDI") and plaintiffs Tech Data Corporation and Tech Data Product Management, Inc. (collectively, "Tech Data") have conferred by and through their counsel and, subject to the Court's approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, September 5, 2014 was the deadline to complete fact discovery in the Tech Data action.

WHEREAS, September 12, 2014 is the deadline to file motions to compel in the Tech Data action.

WHEREAS, SDI and Tech Data have conferred in good faith and agreed that Tech Data will supplement its response to Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.'s Interrogatory No. 24 and provide verifications for all responses to all SDI interrogatories by September 26, 2014.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between counsel as follows:

1. Tech Data will supplement its response to Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.'s Interrogatory No. 24 and provide verifications for all responses to all SDI interrogatories by September 26, 2014. SDI's deadline to file a motion to compel, with respect to Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.'s Interrogatory No. 24, is October 3, 2014.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer