Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WhatsAPP INC. v. INTERCARRIER COMMUNICATIONS LLC, 3:13-CV-4272-JST. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141014986 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING REGARDING CLAIM 3 JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. WHEREAS the Court issued an order allowing InterCarrier Communications, LLC ("ICC") to amend its infringement contentions to include Claim 3 of U.S. Patent No. 6,985,748 on September 4, 2014. WHEREAS WhatsApp, Inc. contends that it is necessary to construe this claim's term "in a common database." WHEREAS ICC does not object to construction of this additional term. IT IS HEREBY ST
More

STIPULATION TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING REGARDING CLAIM 3

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

WHEREAS the Court issued an order allowing InterCarrier Communications, LLC ("ICC") to amend its infringement contentions to include Claim 3 of U.S. Patent No. 6,985,748 on September 4, 2014.

WHEREAS WhatsApp, Inc. contends that it is necessary to construe this claim's term "in a common database."

WHEREAS ICC does not object to construction of this additional term.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the parties and their respective counsel of record and with the permission of the Court, that the parties will exchange supplemental disclosures for the claim term "in a common database" conforming with the requirements set out in Patent Local Rule 4-2 on or before October 6, 2014; that the parties will file a supplemental brief addressing this term, not to exceed three pages exclusive of declarations or exhibits, on or before October 8; that the parties will not rely in these disclosures or this briefing on any expert declaration or testimony; and that the parties will be prepared to offer oral argument on this term at the claim-construction hearing scheduled for October 14, 2014.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Richard G. Frenkel hereby attests that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer