Filed: Oct. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 13, 2014
Summary: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Good Technology Corporation and Good Technology Software, Inc. claim Defendants MobileIron, Inc. and AirWatch, LLC infringe United States Patent Nos 6,151,606 ("Patent '606"), 7,702,322 ("Patent '322"), 7,970,386 ("Patent '386") and 8,012,219 ("Patent `219"). MobileIron counterclaims that Good infringes Unites States Patent No. 8,359,016 ("Patent `016"). Even as they agreed to judicial correction of certain terms, 1 consist
Summary: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Good Technology Corporation and Good Technology Software, Inc. claim Defendants MobileIron, Inc. and AirWatch, LLC infringe United States Patent Nos 6,151,606 ("Patent '606"), 7,702,322 ("Patent '322"), 7,970,386 ("Patent '386") and 8,012,219 ("Patent `219"). MobileIron counterclaims that Good infringes Unites States Patent No. 8,359,016 ("Patent `016"). Even as they agreed to judicial correction of certain terms, 1 consiste..
More
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Good Technology Corporation and Good Technology Software, Inc. claim Defendants MobileIron, Inc. and AirWatch, LLC infringe United States Patent Nos 6,151,606 ("Patent '606"), 7,702,322 ("Patent '322"), 7,970,386 ("Patent '386") and 8,012,219 ("Patent `219"). MobileIron counterclaims that Good infringes Unites States Patent No. 8,359,016 ("Patent `016"). Even as they agreed to judicial correction of certain terms,1 consistent with Pat. L.R. 4-3(c), the parties seek construction of ten others in Good's patents that are in dispute and most significant to the resolution of the case.2 The court also granted AirWatch and MobileIron's motion to construe four other terms3 in addition to its consideration of four terms in MobileIron's patent.4 The parties appeared for two days of hearings on the matters at hand, on August 22, 2014 and September 18, 2014. To avoid further delay, the court proceeds to issue its constructions without its full reasoning and analysis:
PATENT NO. CLAIM TERM/PHRASE CONSTRUCTION
`016 "to provide the ability for the user to select, via "to allow the user to select for installation one or
the application management interface, one or more applications using the application
more of the displayed applications for installation management interface"
on the mobile device"
`016 "mobile device application management "a user interface that allows a user to manage the
interface" applications for a mobile device, which includes
an interface to an enterprise application store"
`016 "identify[ing] required applications" "identify[ing] which applications have been
designated by an administrator as `required' for a
user or set of users"
`016 "comprises one or more of a role, job title, or plain meaning
enterprise group identifier"
`219 "a data tracker configured to track a location of plain meaning; not subject to § 112 ¶ 6
data items held on the client device the data
tracker tracking a correspondence of the data
items to the first set or the second set device"
`219 "list identifying each data item as belonging to plain meaning
one of the first set and the second set"
`322 "searching a compatibility matrix [to identify/for] "for each update, searching rules that indicate
rules associated with each update" whether an update is compatible with a particular
wireless device"
`322 "web-based software server" plain meaning
`322 "rules uniquely identifying the updates for the "rules used to identify updates available for a
wireless device" particular wireless device"
`322 "message indicating one or more files within the "message indicating at least one file within the
updates to [download/upload]" updates to [download/upload]"
`386 "rule" "condition and an action to be taken if that
condition is met"
`386 "the service" not subject to judicial correction; indefinite as
lacking antecedent basis
`386 "rules engine" "component on the wireless device that, without
farther communication with a server, evaluates
the condition(s) specified in one or more rules
received from the server and takes any action
indicated by the ride"
`606 "untrusted client site" "computer accessible to unprivileged users, no
matter the format of a workspace data manager or
the presence of a network firewall"
`606 "synchronizing the manipulated data with the "reconcile[ing] data at the remote site with the
data at the remote site/synchronize the manipulated workspace data"
data/synchronizing the manipulated workspace
data with the generated workspace data of the
second client site via the remote site"
`606 "temporary storage" "storage location for data that is deleted each time
upon logout"
The parties should rest assured that the court arrived at these constructions after substantial study. The court completed its study with a full appreciation of not only the relevant intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, but also the Federal Circuit's teaching in Phillips v. AWH Corp.,5 and its progeny. So that the parties may pursue whatever recourse they believe is necessary, a complete opinion setting out the court's reasoning and analysis will issue before entry of any judgment.
SO ORDERED.
