Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. ANDERSON, 14-cv-01932-JST. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141027a55 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2014
Summary: ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING Re: ECF No. 1 JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Before the Court is the Government's Petition to Enforce an IRS Summons, ECF No. 1, and Respondent's Motion to Strike. ECF No. 44. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for October 30, 2014, is hereby VACATED. However, if any party advises the Court
More

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING

Re: ECF No. 1

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Government's Petition to Enforce an IRS Summons, ECF No. 1, and Respondent's Motion to Strike. ECF No. 44. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for October 30, 2014, is hereby VACATED.

However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the Court's calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer