Filed: Oct. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' ANTICIPATED MOTION TO DISMISS SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. WHEREAS, on April 11, 2014, Court appointed Co-Lead Plaintiffs Ryan Kelly and Louis Mastro (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed a Consolidated Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the "Consolidated Complaint") (Dkt. No. 20) against Defendants Electronic Arts, Inc. ("Electronic Arts"), And
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' ANTICIPATED MOTION TO DISMISS SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. WHEREAS, on April 11, 2014, Court appointed Co-Lead Plaintiffs Ryan Kelly and Louis Mastro (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed a Consolidated Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the "Consolidated Complaint") (Dkt. No. 20) against Defendants Electronic Arts, Inc. ("Electronic Arts"), Andr..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' ANTICIPATED MOTION TO DISMISS
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on April 11, 2014, Court appointed Co-Lead Plaintiffs Ryan Kelly and Louis Mastro (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed a Consolidated Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the "Consolidated Complaint") (Dkt. No. 20) against Defendants Electronic Arts, Inc. ("Electronic Arts"), Andrew Wilson, Blake Jorgensen, Patrick Söderlund, Frank D. Gibeau, Lawrence F. Probst III, and Peter Robert Moore (collectively, "Defendants"), alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of purchasers of Electronic Arts common stock between May 8, 2013 and December 4, 2013;
WHEREAS, on October 20, 2014, the Court entered an order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Complaint with leave to amend (Dkt. No. 45);
WHEREAS, the Court ordered that Plaintiffs must file an amended complaint by no later than November 3, 2014 (id.);
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs would like to extend the deadline for filing an amended complaint by approximately two weeks due to unforeseen scheduling conflicts, to November 18, 2014, and counsel for Defendants have stipulated to the requested extension;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants have also agreed to a briefing schedule for Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss the amended complaint whereby Defendants' motion shall be filed on or by December 23, 2014, Plaintiffs' opposition shall be filed on or by January 20, 2015, and Defendants' reply shall be filed on or by February 3, 2015;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between undersigned counsel, subject to approval of the Court:
The deadline for Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint and briefing schedule for briefing on Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss the amended complaint shall be as follows:
• Plaintiffs' amended complaint due November 18, 2014.
• Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss due December 23, 2014.
• Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss due January 20, 2015.
• Defendants' reply in support of their motion to dismiss due February 3, 2015.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
I, Matthew S. Melamed, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Modifying Schedule for Plaintiffs to File an Amended Complaint and for Briefing on Defendants' Anticipated Motion to Dismiss. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that counsel for Defendants, Robert P. Varian, concurs in this filing.
* * *
ORDER
Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved. Hearing set: 2/13/15 @ 9 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The further case management conference shall be held on 2/13/15 at 3:00 p.m. instead of 1//23/15.
