Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HALL v. DIAMOND FOODS, INC., 3:14-cv-02148-MMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141028l90 Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CANCELLING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAYING CASE ; DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. The parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, Richard Hall ("Plaintiff") filed a putative class action against Diamond Foods, Inc. ("Diamond Foods") in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco; WHEREAS, on April 9, 2014, Plaintiff served Diamond Foods w
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CANCELLING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAYING CASE; DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.

The parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, Richard Hall ("Plaintiff") filed a putative class action against Diamond Foods, Inc. ("Diamond Foods") in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco;

WHEREAS, on April 9, 2014, Plaintiff served Diamond Foods with the summons and complaint in the aforementioned state court action;

WHEREAS, on May 9, 2014, Diamond Foods removed the state court action to this Court;

WHEREAS, on May 27, 2014, Diamond Foods filed a Notice of Related Cases and/or Pendency of Other Actions, which listed Klacko v. Diamond Foods, Inc., No. 9:14-cv-80005 ("Klacko"), a putative class action which was filed in the Southern District of Florida on January 3, 2014, as a Related Case;

WHEREAS, the parties in Klacko have reached a settlement and executed a Stipulation of Class Action Settlement, and the court is currently considering the unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement which was filed on October 22, 2014;

WHEREAS, the Stipulation of Class Action Settlement in Klacko, if finally approved, would settle and release the claims asserted by the Plaintiff herein;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to stay the instant action until the court in Klacko determines whether to grant final approval of the Stipulation of Class Action Settlement;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to inform this Court of the outcome of the Klacko case and whether the court in Klacko grants final approval to the Stipulation of Class Action Settlement;

THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE that that this case is stayed pending the court's decision in Klacko on whether to grant final approval of the Stipulation of Class Action Settlement, and that the case management conference is cancelled until further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Amanda L. Groves attests that Anthony J. Orshansky has consented to the filing of this document.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and for good cause showing, it is hereby ordered that this case is stayed pending the court's decision in Klacko on whether to grant final approval of the Stipulation of Class Action Settlement, and that the case management conference scheduled for October 31, 2014 is cancelled until further notice. The parties are hereby DIRECTED to file, no later than August 7, 2015, a Joint Status Report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer