Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SMITH v. HEDGPETH, C 13-01052 SBA (PR). (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141031a28 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Defendants Vinson, Collier, Ceja, Rodriguez, Powell, Mejai, Roennman, Spaulding, Castillo, Machuca, Sanudo, Miramontes, Reyes, Montano, Diaz, Bailey, Dornan, Franco, Mack, Ornealas, Trexler, and Gudino (Defendants) filed a request for extension of time of seventy-five days, up to and including January 26, 2015, in which to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. The Court has read and considered Defendants' request and the
More

ORDER

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

Defendants Vinson, Collier, Ceja, Rodriguez, Powell, Mejai, Roennman, Spaulding, Castillo, Machuca, Sanudo, Miramontes, Reyes, Montano, Diaz, Bailey, Dornan, Franco, Mack, Ornealas, Trexler, and Gudino (Defendants) filed a request for extension of time of seventy-five days, up to and including January 26, 2015, in which to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion.

The Court has read and considered Defendants' request and the accompanying declaration of counsel, and finds good cause exists to grant the request. Accordingly, Defendants' request for an extension of time is GRANTED. The time for Defendants to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion is extended for seventy-five days, up to and including January 26, 2015. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with this Court and served on Defendants no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date the dispositive motion is filed. A reply brief shall be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff's opposition is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer