TASSANO v. INNOVATIVE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., 3:14-cv-03755 VC. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20141105771
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 04, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: [] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) [] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) [] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement confer
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: [] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) [] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) [] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement confere..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
[] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
X Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private mediation by Stephen S. Harper., Esq.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
X other requested deadline Within 180 days of order issuance
Dated: 10/29/14 Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: 10/29/14 Attorney for Defendant
[PROPOSED] ORDER
[X] The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
[] The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
