Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CRUMP v. AHERN, C12-04357 EMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141110628 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT M. GORDON'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record, that subject to the Court's approval, Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the Second Cause of Action of the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 53); Defendant M. Gordon withdraws his Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complai
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT M. GORDON'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record, that subject to the Court's approval, Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the Second Cause of Action of the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 53); Defendant M. Gordon withdraws his Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 56), which relates to the Second Cause of Action; and the parties will proceed with the balance of the First Amended Complaint intact. This Stipulation is based on the following:

1. On September 30, 2014, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 53) with two causes of action.

2. On October 14, 2014, Defendant M. Gordon filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 56) (the "Motion"), relating solely to the Second Cause of Action of the First Amended Complaint.

3. Plaintiff does not oppose the Motion, and instead hereby voluntarily dismisses the Second Cause of Action, rendering the Motion moot. In response, Defendant M. Gordon hereby withdraws the Motion.

4. The parties will proceed with the balance of the First Amended Complaint intact.

5. The parties respectfully request that the Court enter an Order approving this Stipulation. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory hereto.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer