Melgar v. CSK Auto, Inc., 3:13-CV-03769-EMC. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20141110634
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2014
Summary: JOINT REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiff OSMIN MELGAR and Defendant CSK AUTO, INC. k/n/a O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC, by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, hereby request that the Court permit the parties to appear telephonically at the Further Case Management Conference scheduled for November 13, 2014 at 10:30 am. Counsel for the Parties appeared in-person at the initial Case Management Confer
Summary: JOINT REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiff OSMIN MELGAR and Defendant CSK AUTO, INC. k/n/a O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC, by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, hereby request that the Court permit the parties to appear telephonically at the Further Case Management Conference scheduled for November 13, 2014 at 10:30 am. Counsel for the Parties appeared in-person at the initial Case Management Confere..
More
JOINT REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff OSMIN MELGAR and Defendant CSK AUTO, INC. k/n/a O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC, by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, hereby request that the Court permit the parties to appear telephonically at the Further Case Management Conference scheduled for November 13, 2014 at 10:30 am. Counsel for the Parties appeared in-person at the initial Case Management Conference on November 21, 2013, appeared telephonically at the February 13, 2014 Further Case Management Conference, and appeared in-person again at the May 22, 2014 Further Case Management Conference.
Counsel for the parties' request that they be permitted to appear telephonically at the November 13, 2014 hearing for the purpose of saving their clients the additional costs (both travel costs and additional attorney time) associated with making a personal appearance in San Francisco. Counsel for Plaintiff works and resides in the Los Angeles area and Counsel for the Defendant works and lives in the San Diego area.
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Counsel are hereby ordered to call the Court at __________________ by no later than 10:30 am on November 13, 2014. The Court will call counsel between 11:00 and 12:00 p.m.
Source: Leagle
