U.S. v. CLAYMAN, CV 14-4321-WHO. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20141110b41
Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2014
Summary: [proposed] ORDER WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. IT IS ORDERED THAT Respondent must comply with the Internal Revenue Summons referenced in the petition in this case no later than February 20, 2015; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the November 19, 2014 Order to Show Cause hearing and the December 16, 2014 Case Management Conference are vacated; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the clerk shall close this case and either party may move to reopen to the case if a dispute arises regarding respondent's c
Summary: [proposed] ORDER WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. IT IS ORDERED THAT Respondent must comply with the Internal Revenue Summons referenced in the petition in this case no later than February 20, 2015; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the November 19, 2014 Order to Show Cause hearing and the December 16, 2014 Case Management Conference are vacated; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the clerk shall close this case and either party may move to reopen to the case if a dispute arises regarding respondent's co..
More
[proposed] ORDER
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
IT IS ORDERED THAT Respondent must comply with the Internal Revenue Summons referenced in the petition in this case no later than February 20, 2015;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the November 19, 2014 Order to Show Cause hearing and the December 16, 2014 Case Management Conference are vacated;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the clerk shall close this case and either party may move to reopen to the case if a dispute arises regarding respondent's compliance with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
