In re Heller Ehrman LLP, 08-32514. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20141112982
Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2014
Summary: STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Paravue Corporation (the "Appellant" or "Paravue") and Post-Confirmation Liquidating Debtor Heller Ehrman LLP (the "Appellee" or "Heller") respectfully request that, pursuant to Rule 8009 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Local Bankruptcy Rule 8010-1, and following the parties' meet and confer communications as directed at the Case Management Conference held on October 20, 2014, the Court enter the following Stipulat
Summary: STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Paravue Corporation (the "Appellant" or "Paravue") and Post-Confirmation Liquidating Debtor Heller Ehrman LLP (the "Appellee" or "Heller") respectfully request that, pursuant to Rule 8009 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Local Bankruptcy Rule 8010-1, and following the parties' meet and confer communications as directed at the Case Management Conference held on October 20, 2014, the Court enter the following Stipulate..
More
STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Paravue Corporation (the "Appellant" or "Paravue") and Post-Confirmation Liquidating Debtor Heller Ehrman LLP (the "Appellee" or "Heller") respectfully request that, pursuant to Rule 8009 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Local Bankruptcy Rule 8010-1, and following the parties' meet and confer communications as directed at the Case Management Conference held on October 20, 2014, the Court enter the following Stipulated Scheduling Order:
The parties' briefs on the appeal from the Bankruptcy Court shall be due as follows
• Appellant's Opening Brief January 2, 2015
• Appellee's Answering Brief February 13, 2015
• Appellant's Reply Brief February 27, 2015
Counsel have also met and conferred as to page limitations on the briefs, and respectfully request that the Court enter its order allowing the filing of Opening and Answering Briefs of up to thirty (30) pages each and Appellant's Reply Brief of up to twenty (20) pages.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
