MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC. v. FELDMAN, 3:12-cv-00250-RS. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20141113937
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2014
Summary: [PROPOSED] SO ORDERED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. The parties to this action, by their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. This action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and Release dated September 30, 2014 (the "Settlement Agreement"). 2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Court shall retain jurisdiction, and may re-open this matter through application by a party for the sole purpose of entering and/or
Summary: [PROPOSED] SO ORDERED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. The parties to this action, by their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. This action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and Release dated September 30, 2014 (the "Settlement Agreement"). 2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Court shall retain jurisdiction, and may re-open this matter through application by a party for the sole purpose of entering and/or e..
More
[PROPOSED] SO ORDERED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
The parties to this action, by their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. This action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and Release dated September 30, 2014 (the "Settlement Agreement").
2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Court shall retain jurisdiction, and may re-open this matter through application by a party for the sole purpose of entering and/or enforcing the Settlement Agreement and/or its terms.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
