Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

APPLE INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 5:11-cv-01846-LHK. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141121b29 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL (Re: Docket Nos. 3054, 3055, 3125, 3126, 3127) PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge. Before the court are two motions to stay and three administrative motions to seal 43 documents. "Historically, courts have recognized a `general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.'" 1 Accordingly, when considering a sealing request, "a `strong presumption in favor of access' is the starting point." 2 Parties seeking to seal
More

ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL

(Re: Docket Nos. 3054, 3055, 3125, 3126, 3127)

PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge.

Before the court are two motions to stay and three administrative motions to seal 43 documents. "Historically, courts have recognized a `general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.'"1 Accordingly, when considering a sealing request, "a `strong presumption in favor of access' is the starting point."2 Parties seeking to seal judicial records relating to dispositive motions bear the burden of overcoming the presumption with "compelling reasons" that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure.3

However, "while protecting the public's interest in access to the courts, we must remain mindful of the parties' right to access those same courts upon terms which will not unduly harm their competitive interest."4 Records attached to nondispositive motions therefore are not subject to the strong presumption of access.5 Because the documents attached to nondispositive motions "are often unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action," parties moving to seal must meet the lower "good cause" standard of Rule 26(c).6 As with dispositive motions, the standard applicable to nondispositive motions requires a "particularized showing"7 that "specific prejudice or harm will result" if the information is disclosed.8 "Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples of articulated reasoning" will not suffice.9 A protective order sealing the documents during discovery may reflect the court's previous determination that good cause exists to keep the documents sealed,10 but a blanket protective order that allows the parties to designate confidential documents does not provide sufficient judicial scrutiny to determine whether each particular document should remain sealed.11

In addition to making particularized showings of good cause, parties moving to seal documents must comply with the procedures established by Civ. L.R. 79-5. Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 79-5(b), a sealing order is appropriate only upon a request that establishes the document is "sealable," or "privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law." "The request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material, and must conform with Civil L.R. 79-5(d)."12 "Within 4 days of the filing of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material is sealable."13

With these standards in mind, the courts rules on the instant motions as follows:

Motion Document to be Sealed Result Reason/Explanation Docket No. Exhibit 5 to the DENIED as moot. See Docket No. 3055 3054, Declaration of Joseph ruling. Motion to Mueller in Support of Stay Order Apple's Administrative at Docket Motion to File No. 3041 re Documents Under Seal Docket No. 2374 Docket No. Exhibit 5 to the 2: 35-36; 3:1-2; portions Narrowly tailored to 3055, Declaration of Joseph highlighted in yellow confidential business Motion for Mueller in Support of SEALED. information. Clarification Apple's Administrative of Order at Motion to File Docket No. Documents Under Seal 3041 re Docket No. 2374 Docket No. Documents unsealed by DENIED as moot. See Docket No. 3128 3125, Docket No. 3113. ruling at Docket No. Motion for 3217. Stay of Docket No. 3113 Order Docket Nos. Exhibit E to 9/6/2013 Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2395-03; Declaration of Thomas D. SEALED. confidential business 3126-2 Pease in Support of information. Samsung's Opposition to Apple Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Discovery and for Sanctions for Violations of Protective Order Docket Nos. Exhibit 10 to 10/21/2013 2, ¶4:1-2; portions highlighted Narrowly tailored to 2557-16; Declaration of Mark in yellow SEALED. confidential business 3126-3 Selwyn in Support of information. Apple Inc.'s Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion for Sanctions (8/16/2013 Letter from Robert Becher to William F. Lee) Docket Nos. Samsung's Supplemental 4:16-17; portions highlighted Narrowly tailored to 2556-03; Brief in Support of in yellow SEALED. confidential business 3126-4 Opposition to Apple information. Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Discovery and for Sanctions for Violations of Protective Order dated 10/21/2013 Docket Nos. 10/20/2013 Declaration 5:8-12; portions highlighted in Narrowly tailored to 2556-14; of Kenneth Korea in yellow SEALED. confidential business 3126-5 Support of Samsung's information. Opposition to Apple Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Discovery and for Sanctions for Violations of Protective Order Docket Nos. Exhibit 4 to 10/20/2013 5; portions highlighted in Narrowly tailored to 2556-14; Declaration of Kenneth yellow SEALED. confidential business 3126-5 Korea in Support of information. Samsung's Opposition to Apple Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Discovery and for Sanctions for Violations of Protective Order Docket Nos. Exhibit 5 to 10/20/2013 1, ¶¶2, 3, fn. 1 portions Narrowly tailored to 2556-14; Declaration of Kenneth highlighted in yellow confidential business 3126-5 Korea in Support of SEALED. information. Samsung's Opposition to Apple Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Discovery and for Sanctions for Violations of Protective Order Docket Nos. Exhibit 2 to 10/21/2013 80:16-25, 81:10-14, 82:15-16, Narrowly tailored to 2557-08; Declaration of Mark 172:10-11, 172:16-25, confidential business 3126-6 Selwyn in Support of 173:8-13, 173:16-18, 174:5-7, information. Apple Inc.'s 174:9-13; portions highlighted Supplemental Brief in in yellow SEALED. Support of its Motion for Sanctions (10/17/2013 Deposition Transcript of SeungHo Ahn) Docket Nos. Exhibit 3 to 10/21/2013 203:25-204:8, 206:20-21, Narrowly tailored to 2557-09; Declaration of Mark 207:6-8, 207:22-208:9, confidential business 3126-7 Selwyn in Support of 210:11-20; portions information. Apple Inc.'s highlighted in yellow Supplemental Brief in SEALED. Support of its Motion for Sanctions (10/17/2013 Deposition Transcript of Ken Korea) Docket Nos. Exhibit 6 to 10/21/2013 29, from "Yet" to "Nokia" in Narrowly tailored to 2557-12; Declaration of Mark penultimate paragraph; confidential business 3126-8 Selwyn in Support of portions highlighted in yellow information. Apple Inc.'s SEALED. Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion for Sanctions (Excerpt of Samsung's Initial Submission in Response to the Commission's March 13, 2013 Notice on Remedy and the Public Interest at 29) Docket Nos. Exhibit 8 to 10/21/2013 168:1-5, 168:18-19; portions Narrowly tailored to 2557-14; Declaration of Mark highlighted in yellow confidential business 3126-9 Selwyn in Support of SEALED. information. Apple Inc.'s Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion for Sanctions (10/15/2013 Deposition Transcript of Seongwoo (Clayton) Kim) Docket Nos. Exhibit 9 to 10/21/2013 61:4-7; portions highlighted in Narrowly tailored to 2557-15; Declaration of Mark yellow SEALED. confidential business 3126-10 Selwyn in Support of information. Apple Inc.'s Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion for Sanctions (10/18/2013 Deposition Transcript of Jin Hwan Kwak) Docket Nos. Nokia Corporation's 5:25-6:5, 6:13-14, 6:17-19, Narrowly tailored to 2836-04; Brief in Support of 18:21-25; portions highlighted confidential business 3126-11 Sanctions against in yellow SEALED. information. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan dated 12/2/2013 Docket Nos. Exhibit 39 to 12/2/13 Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2835-06; Declaration of Robert J. SEALED. confidential business 3126-12 Becher in Support of information. Samsung's Response to November 8, 2013 Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions are Not Warranted Docket Nos. Exhibit 1 to December 2, Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2836-06; 2013 Declaration of Ryan SEALED. confidential business 3126-13 W. Koppelman in information. Support of Nokia Corporation's Brief in Support of Sanctions Against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan Docket Nos. Exhibit 23 to 94:3-8, 94:12-96:8, 96:16-97:4, Narrowly tailored to 3126-14; Declaration of Mark 97:10-98:7, 98:12-21, confidential business 2838-07 Selwyn in Support of 99:21-25, 153:19-21, information. Apple Inc.'s Brief 153:6-153:14, 153:24-154:12, Regarding Appropriate 156:25-157:4; portions Sanctions for Samsung's highlighted in yellow Protective Order SEALED. Violations (11/25/2013 Deposition Transcript of Paul Melin) Docket Nos. Exhibit 5 to December 2, 54:12-20; portions highlighted Narrowly tailored to 2836-10; 2013 Declaration of Ryan in yellow SEALED. confidential business 3126-15 W. Koppelman in information. Support of Nokia Corporation's Brief in Support of Sanctions Against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan Docket Nos. Exhibit 26 to Declaration 42:6-7, 54:12-20; portions Narrowly tailored to 2836-10; of Mark Selwyn in highlighted in yellow confidential business 3126-16 Support of Apple Inc.'s SEALED. information. Brief Regarding Appropriate Sanctions for Samsung's Protective Order Violations (11/25/2013 Deposition Transcript of Eeva Hakoranta) Docket Nos. Apple Inc.'s Brief 12:4-11, 13:5, 8, 11-21, Narrowly tailored to 2838-03; Regarding Appropriate 14:5-6; portions highlighted in confidential business 3126-17 Sanctions for Samsung's yellow SEALED. information. Protective Order Violations dated 12/2/2013 Docket Nos. Samsung's Opposition to Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2395; 3127-3 Apple's Motion to SEALED. confidential business Compel Further information. Discovery and for Sanctions Docket Nos. Pease Declaration ISO Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2395; 3127-4 Samsung's Opposition to SEALED. confidential business Apple's Motion to information. Compel Further Discovery and for Sanctions Docket Nos. Exhibit A to the Pease Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2395; 3127-5 Declaration ISO SEALED. confidential business Samsung's Opposition to information. Apple's Motion to Compel Further Discovery and for Sanctions Infringement Contention Docket Nos. Exhibit D to the Pease Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2395; 3127-6 Declaration ISO SEALED. confidential business Samsung's information. Opposition to Apple's Motion to Compel Further Discovery and for Sanctions Docket Nos. Exhibit E to the Pease Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2395; 3127-7 Declaration ISO SEALED. confidential business Samsung's Opposition to information. Apple's Motion to Compel Further Discovery and for Sanctions Docket Nos. Exhibit 2 of the Selwyn 82:18-83:5; 163:16-17, 21-23 Only sealed portions 2557; 3127-8 Declaration ISO Apple 166:1-5, 18, 25; 167:6; narrowly tailored to Inc.'s Supplemental Brief portions highlighted in yellow confidential business in Support of Its Motion SEALED; 215 index information. for Sanctions highlights SEALED except "102:6:7" UNSEALED. Docket Nos. Exhibit 3 of the Selwyn 203:25-204:3; 206:20-21; Narrowly tailored to 2557; 3127-9 Declaration ISO Apple 207:6-8, 25; 208:7; 210:12, confidential business Inc.'s Supplemental Brief 19; 339 index; portions information. in Support of Its Motion highlighted in yellow for Sanctions SEALED. Docket Nos. Exhibit 9 of the Selwyn 61:5-7; 159:5-7; portions Only sealed portions 2557; Declaration ISO Apple highlighted in yellow narrowly tailored to 3127-10 Inc.'s Supplemental Brief SEALED; 225-226 index confidential business in Support of Its Motion highlights SEALED except information. for Sanctions "103:5:19" UNSEALED. Docket Nos. Exhibit 10 of the Selwyn Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2557; Declaration ISO Apple SEALED. confidential business 3127-11 Inc.'s Supplemental Brief information. in Support of Its Motion for Sanctions Docket Nos. Exhibit 15 of the Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2558; Koppelman Declaration SEALED. confidential business 3127-12 ISO Nokia's Ex-Parte information. Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal Docket Nos. Samsung's Motion for Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2610; Leave to Take Discovery SEALED. confidential business 3127-13 information. Docket Nos. Samsung's Response to 16:17-17:3; 17:7-9; portions Narrowly tailored to 2835; November 8, 2013 Order highlighted in yellow confidential business 3127-14 to Show Cause Why SEALED. information. Sanctions are Not Warranted Docket Nos. Exhibit 39 of the Becher 96:24-97:4; 174:24-175:1; Narrowly tailored to 3127; Declaration ISO 175:5-6, 12-13; portions confidential business 2835-15 Samsung's Response to highlighted in yellow information. November 2, 2013 Order SEALED. to Show Cause Why Sanctions are Not Warranted Docket Nos. Nokia's Brief ISO 6:2-5, 13-14; 18:12-19, 21-25; Narrowly tailored to 2836; Sanctions Against portions highlighted in yellow confidential business 3127-16; Samsung and Quinn SEALED. information. Emmanuel Docket Nos. Exhibit 1 of the 53:12-13; 54: 7-9; 72:10-14; Narrowly tailored to 2836; Koppelman Declaration 73:19-24; 96:24-97:4; confidential business 3127-17 ISO Nokia's Brief portions highlighted in yellow information. ISO Sanctions Against SEALED. Samsung and Quinn Emmanuel Docket Nos. Apple's Brief Regarding 12:9-11, 13-16; 13:5, 7-8, 12, Narrowly tailored to 2838; Appropriate Sanctions for 21; 14:5-8; portions confidential business 3127-18 Samsung's Protective highlighted in yellow information. Order Violations SEALED. Docket Nos. Exhibit 22 to Selwyn 38:11-12, 14-15; 38:22-39:21; Narrowly tailored to 2838; Declaration ISO Apple's 40:21-41:2; portions confidential business 3127-19 Brief Regarding highlighted in yellow information. Appropriate Sanctions for SEALED. Samsung's Protective Order Violations Docket Nos. Exhibit 23 to Selwyn 45:25; 53:12-13; 54: 7-9; Narrowly tailored to 2838; Declaration ISO Apple's 72:10-14; 73:19-24; 80:17-18; confidential business 3127-20 Brief Regarding 96:24-97:4; 154:1, 8-12; information. Appropriate Sanctions for 157:2; 174:24-175:1; 175:5-6, Samsung's Protective 12-13; 246:24; 247:1-10, 15-Order Violations 16, 18-21, 24-25; 248:1-7; 249:14-19; 250:13-19; 251:11-20, 22-23; 252:2-13; 12, 39 index highlights; portions highlighted in yellow SEALED. Docket Nos. Exhibit 25 to Selwyn Portions highlighted in yellow Narrowly tailored to 2838; Declaration ISO Apple's SEALED. confidential business 3127-21 Brief Regarding information. Appropriate Sanctions for Samsung's Protective Order Violations Docket Nos. Exhibit 26 to Selwyn 58:6-7, 15, 22; 59:4, 9, 10, Narrowly tailored to 2838; Declaration ISO Apple's 13-17, 19-20, 22-23; 60:1; 13 confidential business 3127-22 Brief Regarding index highlights; portions information. Appropriate Sanctions for highlighted in yellow Samsung's Protective SEALED. Order Violations Docket Nos. Nokia's Supplemental 4:16-17, 19; 5:6-7, 22-24; Narrowly tailored to 2872; Brief portions highlighted in yellow confidential business 3127-23 SEALED. information. Docket Nos. Samsung's Supplemental In addition to the portions Narrowly tailored to 2556-3; Brief in Support of already sealed by the confidential business 3127 Opposition to Apple Court: 4:25-26 (the portion of information. Inc.'s Motion to Compel the sentence that follows "stated that he understood that"); 5:10-14 SEALED. Docket Nos. Declaration of SeungHo In addition to the portions Narrowly tailored to 2556-8; Ahn already sealed by the confidential business 3127 Court: 4:24 SEALED. information.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n. 7 (1978)).
2. Id. (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)).
3. Id. at 1178-79.
4. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 727 F.3d 1214, 1228-29 (Fed. Cir. 2013).
5. See id. at 1180.
6. Id. at 1179 (internal quotations and citations omitted).
7. Id.
8. Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c).
9. Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int'l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992).
10. See Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179-80.
11. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(A) ("Reference to a stipulation or protective order that allows a party to designate certain documents as confidential is not sufficient to establish that a document, or portions thereof, are sealable.").
12. Civ. L.R. 79-5(b). In part, Civ. L.R. 79-5(d) requires the submitting party to attach a "proposed order that is narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material" which "lists in table format each document or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed," Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(b), and an "unreadacted version of the document" that indicates "by highlighting or other clear method, the portions of the document that have been omitted from the redacted version." Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(d).
13. Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1). The Civil Local Rules have recently been amended shortening the time available to the designating party to file a supporting declaration from seven days to four days. As this rule change was only recently implemented the court applies the prior form of Civ. L.R. 79-5 for the purposes of this order.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer