Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. HARKONEN, CR 08-00164 RS. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141203863 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. The United States, by and through its counsel Assistant United States Attorney Kyle F. Waldinger and U.S. Department of Justice Trial Attorney Allan Gordus, and the defendant-petitioner W. Scott Harkonen, by and through his counsel Dennis P. Riordan, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On July 30, 2014, W. Scott Harkonen filed a Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis under 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) see
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

The United States, by and through its counsel Assistant United States Attorney Kyle F. Waldinger and U.S. Department of Justice Trial Attorney Allan Gordus, and the defendant-petitioner W. Scott Harkonen, by and through his counsel Dennis P. Riordan, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On July 30, 2014, W. Scott Harkonen filed a Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) seeking an order vacating his conviction. Doc. 399. The Petition was subsequently assigned to the Honorable Richard Seeborg. Doc. 403.

2. On August 14, 2014, the Court issued an order directing the United States to show cause as to why the Petition should not be granted. The Court ordered the United States to file its response by September 15, 2014.

3. On August 27, 2014, based on a stipulation of the parties, the Court amended the briefing schedule to allow the United States to file any opposition seeking dismissal or denial of the Petition on December 12, 2014, and for the Defendant-Petitioner to file his reply on January 30, 2015. CR 406.

4. Since that time, counsel for the United States has been working on the United States' opposition. However, because of work on other matters and the number of issues raised in the Petition, the United States needs additional time to complete a thorough response to the Petition.

5. Accordingly, after conferring, the parties now jointly stipulate and agree to the following amended briefing schedule:

January 23, 2015 Government to file any opposition seeking dismissal or denial of the Petition February 27, 2015 Defendant-Petitioner to file any reply

SO STIPULATED.

Date: December 2, 2014 /s/ DENNIS P. RIORDAN Attorney for W. SCOTT HARKONEN

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer