Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Teespring v. Viralstyle, LLC, 3:14-cv-04724-JCS. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141203880 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT VIRALSTYLE, LLC TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT JOSEPH C. SPERO, District Judge. WHEREAS, Defendant Viralstyle, LLC ("Defendant") was served with a copy of the summons, complaint, and other case-initiating documents by Plaintiff Teespring ("Plaintiff") on October 28, 2014, making its response to the complaint due on November 18, 2014; WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant had previously agreed to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the comp
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT VIRALSTYLE, LLC TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

JOSEPH C. SPERO, District Judge.

WHEREAS, Defendant Viralstyle, LLC ("Defendant") was served with a copy of the summons, complaint, and other case-initiating documents by Plaintiff Teespring ("Plaintiff") on October 28, 2014, making its response to the complaint due on November 18, 2014;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant had previously agreed to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the complaint by ten days until November 28, 2014; and

WHEREAS, Defendant requested, and Plaintiff agreed to, an additional one-week extension of Defendant's deadline to respond to the complaint, and good cause exists for the extension due to the Thanksgiving holiday.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) by and between Plaintiff and Defendant through their counsel of record, that Defendant shall have until December 5, 2014 to file its response to the complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer