Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Segan LLC v. Zynga Inc., 3:14-cv-01315-VC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141212753 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge. By Settlement Conference Order dated October 10, 2014 ("Settlement Conference Order") (Dkt. No. 82), United States Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore scheduled a second, follow-up settlement conference in this matter (after holding an initial conference on October 10, 2014) for December 19, 2014, at 11:00 a.m. at the U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612. Pursuant to No
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER

KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.

By Settlement Conference Order dated October 10, 2014 ("Settlement Conference Order") (Dkt. No. 82), United States Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore scheduled a second, follow-up settlement conference in this matter (after holding an initial conference on October 10, 2014) for December 19, 2014, at 11:00 a.m. at the U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612. Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Segan LLC ("Segan") and Defendant Zynga, Inc. ("Zynga") by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate and jointly ask the Court to extend the Settlement Conference Order as follows:

Event Scheduled Date Proposed Extension

Settlement Conference December 19, 2014 The parties will jointly contact Judge Westmore's Chambers no later than 60 ays after the close of fact discovery to identify a future date to reschedule the settlement conference

1. The requested time modification will not affect any other case deadline already fixed by the Court.

2. This is the parties' first request to amend the October 10, 2014 Settlement Conference Order.

3. This extension is sought because the parties are in the process of addressing a number of discovery issues and there remains significant disagreement on material elements of the case.

4. Accordingly, the parties believe that a settlement conference would not be productive at this time. The parties agree, subject to Court approval, to postpone the December 19 settlement conference and jointly contact Judge Westmore's Chambers no later than 60 days after the close of fact discovery to identify a future date to reschedule the December 19, 2014, settlement conference.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, David Dorey, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer