Federal Trade Commission v. AT&T Mobility LLC, 14-CV-04785-EMC. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20141215690
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2014
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINES FOR MOTION TO DISMISS, OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS, AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, AND FOR SCHEDULING OF HEARING AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, defendant AT&T Mobility LLC ("AT&T") and plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") (collectively, the "Parties") hereby stipulate to an extension of the filing deadline
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINES FOR MOTION TO DISMISS, OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS, AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, AND FOR SCHEDULING OF HEARING AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, defendant AT&T Mobility LLC ("AT&T") and plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") (collectively, the "Parties") hereby stipulate to an extension of the filing deadline g..
More
STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINES FOR MOTION TO DISMISS, OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS, AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, AND FOR SCHEDULING OF HEARING AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, defendant AT&T Mobility LLC ("AT&T") and plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") (collectively, the "Parties") hereby stipulate to an extension of the filing deadline governing AT&T's motion to dismiss, and hereby file a stipulated request for a court order: (1) extending the deadlines governing (i) the FTC's opposition to AT&T's motion to dismiss and (ii) AT&T's reply in support of its motion to dismiss; and (2) scheduling an initial case management conference and a hearing on AT&T's motion to dismiss. The Parties require additional time to investigate all relevant issues and to submit their filings to the Court. The requested modifications will not affect the schedule for the case. The Parties therefore stipulate to the following schedule:
Filing Scheduled Due Date Stipulated Due Date
Motion To Dismiss December 29, 2014. See Fed. January 5, 2015
R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(ii).
Opposition to Motion To 14 days after the motion to
Dismiss dismiss is filed. See Civil February 4, 2015
L.R. 7-3(a).
Reply in Support of 7 days after the opposition is February 18, 2015
Motion To Dismiss filed. See Civil L.R. 7-3(c).
Proceeding Stipulated Date
Hearing on Motion To March 12, 2015
Dismiss
Initial Case Management March 12, 2015
Conference
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the reasons for the requested modification are set forth in a supporting declaration accompanying this request.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from all other signatories and that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
