Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Trans'-Global LLC v. DeTomasi, C13-2149 WHO. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141216a90 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2014
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EARLY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, VACATING ALL TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DATES WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. Plaintiff Trans'-Global LLC, a California limited liability company ("Plaintiff"), Defendants Lia DeTomasi; Mario P. DeTomasi; Lori Thornton; Jeffrey Donati; Daniel Donati; Marcia M. Melnikoff; Lawrence Bertolucci; Lia DeTomasi As Trustee Of The Bertha A. Donati Trust FBO Marc Donati; Lia DeTomasi and Mario P. DeTomasi As Trustees Of The DeTomasi Family Trust U/A/D
More

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EARLY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, VACATING ALL TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DATES

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

Plaintiff Trans'-Global LLC, a California limited liability company ("Plaintiff"), Defendants Lia DeTomasi; Mario P. DeTomasi; Lori Thornton; Jeffrey Donati; Daniel Donati; Marcia M. Melnikoff; Lawrence Bertolucci; Lia DeTomasi As Trustee Of The Bertha A. Donati Trust FBO Marc Donati; Lia DeTomasi and Mario P. DeTomasi As Trustees Of The DeTomasi Family Trust U/A/D June 28, 2005; Lori Thornton And Lia DeTomasi, As Trustees Of The Bertha Donati Trust U/A/D September 30, 1996; Marc Donati And Vickie Donati, As Trustees Of The Bertha A. Donati Trust; Paul Donati, Elisa M. Donati Klunis And Steve Donati, As Trustees Of The Julio A. Donati Family Trust U/A/D June 21, 2002; Marcia M. Melnikoff As Trustee Of The Testamentary Trust Under The Will Of Josephine Bertolucci; Marcia M. Melnikoff And Lawrence Bertolucci As Trustees Of The Lawrence R. Bertolucci Revocable Living Trust Dated June 6, 2007 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Owner Defendants"); Ki Moon Hong; Myung S. Hong; and Sumi Kimura and Cross-Defendant Thomas G. Palmer, Jr. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Operator Defendants") (Plaintiff, Owner Defendants, and Operator Defendants together, the "Parties), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby submit the following stipulation to request a date for a case management conference in January 2015, prior to the presently scheduled February 10, 2015 conference so that the Parties can provide an update to the court and request that the current trial and pre-trial dates be vacated.

WHEREAS, the above-captioned matter involved environmental contamination that Plaintiff alleges results from the operation of a dry cleaner on Plaintiff's real property at 1053 El Camino Real, South San Francisco, California. Plaintiff's complaint alleges causes of action under CERCLA, among other claims.

WHEREAS, on June 3, 2014, the Parties appeared for a case management conference, discussed the status of the case and agreed to participate in mediation. The court set a November 16, 2015 trial date and other associated pre-trial dates.

WHEREAS, the Parties initially selected a mediation date of October 8, 2014. Plaintiff obtained competitive bids for the necessary soil and shallow groundwater removal, selected a contractor and scheduled the work for late 2014. Prior to the October mediation date, the San Mateo County Department of Environmental Health ("County"), which is overseeing Plaintiff's environmental investigation and remediation, notified Plaintiff of groundwater contamination at a nearby San Francisco Public Utility Commission groundwater well and requested additional groundwater investigation at Plaintiff's property.

WHEREAS, on September 11, 2014, Plaintiff submitted to the County a Groundwater Investigation Work Plan. Plaintiff scheduled the additional groundwater investigation to begin on October 22, 2014, but it was delayed briefly to October 29, 2014.

WHEREAS, in early October 2014, the Parties requested that the court postpone the October 31, 2014 mediation deadline until January 31, 2015, to give the plaintiff time to conduct the scheduled groundwater investigation and determine if additional costs associated with groundwater investigation and remediation will be necessary. The court granted the Parties' request and set a further case management conference for February 10, 2015.

WHEREAS, on October 30, 2014, the day after plaintiff had begun the additional groundwater investigation, the County sent a letter that requested, among other things, additional sampling along the sanitary sewer lateral on Plaintiff's property and suggested the possibility that deeper soil and groundwater samples would need to be collected, depending on the results of the then-ongoing investigation. The County requested that its additional issues be addressed in a report due by January 30, 2015.

WHEREAS, given the County's demand for additional investigation, Plaintiff will not be able to develop an estimate of future costs prior to the January 13, 2015 mediation. Plaintiff will not have an estimate of future costs, at the earliest, until it completes the additional work requested in the County's October 30, 2014 letter, and depending on the results of that work, until after additional necessary investigation is conducted at the site.

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the most cost-effective course of action is to delay mediation until Plaintiff completes the work required by the County and is in a position to more accurately assess the future actions and associated costs required to obtain site closure.

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties request that the court set a date for case management at the earliest opportunity and in advance of the presently scheduled February 10, 2015 case management conference. The Parties request that the court vacate the presently scheduled trial date and all pretrial dates and stay the matter for 4-6 months to allow the plaintiff to conduct additional environmental investigation at the site. The Parties have agreed to submit responses to recently propounded written discovery — plaintiff will submit responses and responsive documents on or before January 16, 2015 and defendants will submit responses and responsive documents or before January 21, 2015. The Donati and Melnikoff defendants also reserve the right to file a dispositive motion during the stay and plaintiff requests that the Parties discuss and agree upon a briefing schedule for any such motion.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based on the stipulation submitted by counsel and good cause appearing therefor: The court will hold a further case management conference on January 13, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. to address the Parties' request to vacate the November 16, 2015 trial date and all associated pre-trial dates, to vacate the January 31, 2015 mediation deadline and to enter a 4-6 month stay of the case, with the exception of the currently outstanding written discovery. The court will also address and determine a briefing schedule for the Donati and Melnikoff parties' dispositive motion.

The further case management conference set for February 10, 2015 is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer