Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. GIBSON, 3:14-CR-00059 TEH. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141216a94 Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING HEARING DATE AND EXCLUDIDNG TIME THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge. The above-captioned matter came before the Court for a hearing on December 8, 2014. The Court set a further status conference for December 15, 2014. In an Order dated December 9, 2014, the Court continued the status conference to December 22, 2014. The parties hereby stipulate due to unavailability of defense counsel, with the Court's permission, to reset the status conferenc
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING HEARING DATE AND EXCLUDIDNG TIME

THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.

The above-captioned matter came before the Court for a hearing on December 8, 2014. The Court set a further status conference for December 15, 2014. In an Order dated December 9, 2014, the Court continued the status conference to December 22, 2014.

The parties hereby stipulate due to unavailability of defense counsel, with the Court's permission, to reset the status conference hearing to January 5, 2015.

Based upon good cause the Court hereby resets the status conference to 1/5/15 at 2:30 p.m.

The Court ordered an exclusion of time from and including December 8, 2014, through and including December 15, 2014. The time is appropriate and necessary under Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(1)(A) and (h)(7)(A), to determine the physical capacity of the defendant, and because the needs of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The parties stipulate and agree that an exclusion of time is also appropriate from and including December 15, 2014, through and including January 5, 2015, for the same reason.

Therefore, the Court finds that the time from and including December 8, 2014, through including January 5, 2015, is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(A) and (h)(7)(A), to determine the physical capacity of the defendant, and because the ends of justice served by such exclusion outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

A representative from the San Francisco Sheriff's Department shall either attend the January 5, 2015 status conference, or else file the declaration described in the Court's December 9, 2014 Order, no later than January 2, 2015. The Government shall serve this Order on Dr. Joe Goldenson at the San Francisco County Jail and on the San Francisco Sheriff's Department.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer