Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rodriguez v. City of Alameda, 14-cv-02075-TEH. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141217a10 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TIME TO COMPLETE ENE AND CONTINUING CMC UNTIL AFTER ENE COMPLETED THELTON E. HENDERSON, Senior District Judge. Defense counsel Gregory M. Fox was associated into this matter on July 11, 2014 after it was removed to federal court. The initial CMC was held September 15, 2014. The parties had stipulated to ENE and the matter was ordered to ENE with the ENE session to be completed by December 31, 2014. William Goodman was assigned as the ENE Evalu
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TIME TO COMPLETE ENE AND CONTINUING CMC UNTIL AFTER ENE COMPLETED

THELTON E. HENDERSON, Senior District Judge.

Defense counsel Gregory M. Fox was associated into this matter on July 11, 2014 after it was removed to federal court. The initial CMC was held September 15, 2014. The parties had stipulated to ENE and the matter was ordered to ENE with the ENE session to be completed by December 31, 2014. William Goodman was assigned as the ENE Evaluator and the ENE session is currently scheduled for December 17, 2014. The next CMC is January 5, 2015.

Plaintiff contends that as a result of the police use of force he suffered a brain injury. The parties have been cooperating in discovery and agreed that certain material witness depositions should be completed before the ENE session including the depositions of independent eye witnesses, the plaintiff, and the involved officers. To date, seven depositions have been completed. Scheduling issues with the remaining depositions have arisen which the parties agree show good cause for a continuance of the ENE deadline and the next CMC to allow for a meaningful ENE session. Therefore, the parties now stipulate for an Order continuing the deadline to complete the ENE so relevant discovery may be completed and continuing the CMC to a new date to allow completion of the ENE before the next CMC.

Good cause exists for this continuance for the following reasons: Defendant Cameron Miele has been off work and out of state for personal family reasons from December 8 through December 15 and was thus unable to be deposed or attend the plaintiff's deposition that were both tentatively scheduled for the week of December 8, 2014. As defendant, Cameron Miele was a key participant in the incident that led to this action, and therefore his testimony in deposition is critical for a meaningful ENE session. As noted above, the parties have deposed a number of civilian witnesses; however, the parties have had trouble locating Brian Grappo, a key civilian witness, for deposition. Investigation into his whereabouts continues. And plaintiff's counsel has met and conferred with defense counsel on certain accommodations for plaintiff's deposition and that meet and confer process is underway. Therefore, the parties agree that defendant Cameron Miele, plaintiff Michael Rodriguez and witness Brian Grappo should be deposed prior to the initial ENE session, and these depositions cannot be completed before the currently scheduled December 17, 2014 ENE session.

Scheduling these depositions, holding the ENE session and attending the January 5, 2015 CMC are also complicated because defense counsel Gregory Fox is currently scheduled for a wrongful death police OIS jury trial set for January 12, 2015 before the Hon. William Orrick which involves Mr. Fox as trial counsel for the defendants in the matter of Dorger, et al v. City of Napa, et al, case number 3:12 CV 00440 WHO, and expert discovery in that case is being scheduled for the last week of December, 2014 and the first week of January, 2015.

Based on these reasons, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, plaintiff Michael Rodriguez, represented by John E. Hill and defendants City of Alameda and Cameron Miele, represented by Gregory M. Fox that the following should become an Order of the Court:

1. The early neutral evaluation session previously calendared for Wednesday, December 17, 2014, shall be continued to a mutually convenient date for all parties and the Evaluator and to be completed within 90 days of the date of this Order.

2. The parties and their attorneys, and the early neutral evaluator, shall agree to a discovery and briefing schedule and the date for the ENE and, upon reaching such an agreement, shall file notification of the same with the Court.

3. The parties and their attorneys recognize that such continuance is made in good faith and the attorneys feel that the requested continuance of the ENE session will result in an evaluation that may facilitate resolution of the entire matter.

4. The parties request that the CMC now scheduled for January 5, 2015 be continued March 2, 2015 to allow time for completion of the ENE in February 2015.

SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the Stipulation SO ORDERED. The deadline to complete ENE is continued 90 days from the date of this Order. The January 5, 2015 CMC is continued to March 2, 2015 with a joint CMC statement to be filed February 23, 2015.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer