Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MAZZA v. ARNOLD, C 14-1644 RMW (PR). (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141218b36 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE (Docket No. 7) RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se , seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On August 21, 2014, the court issued an order to show cause directing respondent to file an answer or a dispositive motion within sixty days. (Docket No. 6.) On October 20, 2014, respondent filed a motion requesting an extension of time in which to file an answer or a dispositi
More

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE

(Docket No. 7)

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 21, 2014, the court issued an order to show cause directing respondent to file an answer or a dispositive motion within sixty days. (Docket No. 6.) On October 20, 2014, respondent filed a motion requesting an extension of time in which to file an answer or a dispositive motion because counsel had only been assigned to represent respondent on October 10, 2014. (Docket No. 7.)

Having shown good cause, respondent's motion is GRANTED. Respondent shall file an answer or dispositive motion within thirty (30) days from the filing date of this order. Petitioner shall file a traverse within thirty (30) days of the filing of an answer, or an opposition within twenty-eight (28) days of the filing of a dispositive motion. If respondent files a dispositive motion, he shall file a reply within fourteen (14) days from the filing date of an opposition.

This order terminates docket number 7.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer