Filed: Dec. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESOLVING DEFENDANTS CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. AND CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. WHEREAS, Defendants Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. and Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. (collectively "CPT") filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction on November 5, 2014 (ECF No. 2960) ("Motion"); WHEREAS, the Court previously ruled on Motions to D
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESOLVING DEFENDANTS CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. AND CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. WHEREAS, Defendants Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. and Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. (collectively "CPT") filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction on November 5, 2014 (ECF No. 2960) ("Motion"); WHEREAS, the Court previously ruled on Motions to Di..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESOLVING DEFENDANTS CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. AND CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
WHEREAS, Defendants Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. and Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. (collectively "CPT") filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction on November 5, 2014 (ECF No. 2960) ("Motion");
WHEREAS, the Court previously ruled on Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, ECF No. 2437 and ECF No. 2611, and found that personal jurisdiction existed over other defendants;
WHEREAS, the Direct Action Plaintiffs (collectively "Plaintiffs") and CPT seek to avoid expending time and the Court's limited resources;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned counsel on behalf of CPT and Plaintiffs (the "Stipulating Parties"), that:
1. The Court's prior rulings on March 13, 2014 (ECF No. 2437) and June 9, 2014 (ECF No. 2611) apply to CPT's Motion, and CPT's Motion is hereby denied;
2. The Stipulating Parties preserve their right to appeal the denial of CPT's Motion, and all arguments, including arguments regarding whether those prior rulings are correct or incorrect, are preserved for appeal as to CPT's Motion.
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.