Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

O'CONNOR v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CV 13-03826-EMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141222820 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY BY ONE DAY EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Douglas O'Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and, Elie Gurfinkel ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREA
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY BY ONE DAY

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Douglas O'Connor, Thomas Colopy, Matthew Manahan, and, Elie Gurfinkel ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is currently due on December 29, 2014, in the midst of the holiday season and Plaintiffs' counsel's travel plans could be accommodated by filing Plaintiffs' Opposition and accompanying documents one day later on December 30, 2014;

WHEREAS, in the interest of fairness, Defendant should receive an additional day to prepare its Reply brief, which is currently due on January 8, 2015,

WHEREAS, the parties believe that a one-day delay will not interfere with the Court's review of the briefing in this case prior to the scheduled hearing date of January 29, 2015;

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant, acting through their respective counsel, subject to this Court's approval, as follows:

Plaintiffs' Memorandum of law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed on December 30, 2014.

Defendant's Reply brief in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed on

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

IS IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer