RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
The parties respectfully file this Proposed Stipulated Motion for Extension of the Class Certification Schedule.
On October 20, 2014, this Court entered an Order titled Stipulation re Revised Joint [Proposed] Schedule for Class Certification ("Order") (Dkt. No. 147). The Order set a briefing schedule on Plaintiffs' motion for class certification, requiring Plaintiffs opening brief to be filed on or before January 8, 2015, and a hearing date of June 11, 2015.
The Order stated that all discovery regarding Plaintiffs' motion for class certification should be completed by December 19, 2014. The Order also required the parties to "meet and confer in good faith on outstanding discovery issues regarding Plaintiffs' motion for class certification so that, on or before November 14, 2014, they will present to the Court any issues that remain unresolved." Safeway served objections and responses to Plaintiffs' requests for admission and a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice on November 11, 2014; objections and responses to Plaintiffs' requests for production on November 13, 2014; and objections and response to Plaintiffs' interrogatories on November 14, 2014. Although Safeway's document request responses state that it will produce responsive documents, but Safeway has yet to produce any documents.
On November 14, 2014, per the Court's order the parties filed a Joint Case Status Report, in which Plaintiffs explained that they had reached an impasse on several discovery issues (Dkt. No. 148). This Court entered an order stating that any discovery disputes should be presented to the assigned magistrate judge, and that "[i]f further relief from the class certification briefing schedule or other case management deadlines becomes necessary, the parties may proceed by stipulation or motion presented to the undersigned." (Dkt. No. 149).
Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel regarding their Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice on December 8, 2014 (Dkt. No. 152). Plaintiffs asked the Court to overrule Safeway's objections to providing testimony regarding its recall policies, practices and procedures, and not just concerning recalls of eggs and peanut butter products; and its objections to providing testimony on the "Just for U" program, which Safeway uses to communicate directly with customers on their smartphones. On December 16, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiffs' motion, overruling Safeway's objections on all of the substantive topics on which Safeway refused to provide testimony, and ordered Safeway to produce witnesses to testify within 30 days from the date of its Order, i.e., January 15, 2015 (Dkt. No. 153).
Given the Court's order setting a new deadline for Safeway to designate and produce its corporate designees for deposition, the parties request that the Court remove the discovery deadline and extend Plaintiffs' time to file their opening brief in support of class certification to