Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Madamba v. Quality Loan Services, LLC, 3:14-cv-04590-RS. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141231882 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. RECITALS This stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiffs ROWEN MADAMBA and LILIA MADAMBA ("Plaintiffs'") and Defendant CITIMORTGAGE, INC., ("Defendant"). The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the above-referenced action on October 14, 2014; 2. WHEREAS, Plaint
More

STIPULATION REGARDING COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

RECITALS

This stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiffs ROWEN MADAMBA and LILIA MADAMBA ("Plaintiffs'") and Defendant CITIMORTGAGE, INC., ("Defendant"). The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the above-referenced action on October 14, 2014;

2. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is due December 26, 2014;

3. WHEREAS, the hearing on defendant CitiMortgage's Motion to Dismiss is set for January 22, 2015;

4. WHEREAS, Defendant CitiMortgage consents to the requested extension of up to and including January 8, 2015, for plaintiffs to file their opposition brief;

5. WHEREAS, the parties agreed to extend the time for Defendant to file a reply until January 15, 2015;

6. WHEREAS, this stipulation will not result in prejudice to any party and its impact on judicial proceedings is not expected to be significant; and

7. WHEREAS, these changes will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.

STIPULATION

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel of record, agree and stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiffs shall have up to and including January 8, 2015 to file an opposition brief to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. 2. Defendant shall have up to and including January 15, 2015 to file a reply to Plaintiffs' opposition brief to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Having reviewed the stipulation of Plaintiffs ROWEN MADAMBA and LILIA MADAMBA and Defendant CITIMORTGAGE, INC., and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiffs shall have up to and including January 8, 2015 to file an opposition brief to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. 2. Defendant shall have up to and including January 15, 2015 to file a reply to Plaintiffs' opposition brief to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer