Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. VALVERDE-RUMBO, 14-CR-00620-RMW. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150128h88 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ ] ORDER CHANGING STATUS HEARING FROM JANUARY 29, 2015, AT 2:00 P.M. TO FEBRUARY 23, 2015 AT 9:00 A.M. AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM JANUARY 26, 2015 TO FEBRUARY 23, 2015 RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Defendant Hugo Valverde-Rumbo, represented by Gabriela M. Lopez, Esq., and the government, represented by Maia T. Perez, Assistant United States Attorney, respectfully request that the January 29, 2015, status hearing in the above-captioned matter be rescheduled to February 23, 2015
More

STIPULATION AND [ ] ORDER CHANGING STATUS HEARING FROM JANUARY 29, 2015, AT 2:00 P.M. TO FEBRUARY 23, 2015 AT 9:00 A.M. AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM JANUARY 26, 2015 TO FEBRUARY 23, 2015

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Defendant Hugo Valverde-Rumbo, represented by Gabriela M. Lopez, Esq., and the government, represented by Maia T. Perez, Assistant United States Attorney, respectfully request that the January 29, 2015, status hearing in the above-captioned matter be rescheduled to February 23, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., and that a time exclusion order be issued that would exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act from January 26, 2015, to February 23, 2015, to permit the parties the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation. The reason for the request to change the status date is that defense counsel has a conflicting appearance in Oakland, California on a state matter on January 29, 2015, and will not be able to appear in San Jose at that time. The parties also need additional time to work on negotiated dispositions.

SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the status hearing in this case for Defendant Hugo Valverde-Rumbo be rescheduled from January 29, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. to February 23, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.

For good cause shown, the Court further finds that failing to exclude the time between January 26, 2015, and February 23, 2015, would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between January 26, 2015, and February 23, 2015, from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the time between January 26, 2015, and February 23, 2015, shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer