Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BIOGEN IDEC MA INC. v. TRAN, C 15-0743 CRB. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150522831 Visitors: 1
Filed: May 21, 2015
Latest Update: May 21, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE AND ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . STIPULATED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C 15-0743 CRB This Unopposed Motion and Proposed Order ("Motion") is made by Plaintiff Biogen Idec MA Inc. ("Biogen"). Pursuant to Local Civ. R. 6-3, Biogen requests as follows: 1. The Case Management Conference is presently set for May 22, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. 2. The parties have reached an agreement in principle to resolve the dispute. 3. Def
More

STIPULATED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE AND ORDER

STIPULATED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C 15-0743 CRB

This Unopposed Motion and Proposed Order ("Motion") is made by Plaintiff Biogen Idec MA Inc. ("Biogen").

Pursuant to Local Civ. R. 6-3, Biogen requests as follows:

1. The Case Management Conference is presently set for May 22, 2015 at 8:30 a.m.

2. The parties have reached an agreement in principle to resolve the dispute.

3. Defendant Tran is an individual proceeding pro se in this matter. Defendant Neurobiogen is an unrepresented corporate entity incapable of proceeding pro se.

4. Pursuant to the parties' agreement, earlier today, Biogen and Defendant Tran filed a stipulation and [Proposed] Final Judgment Upon Consent and Permanent Injunction, disposing of all issues as against Defendant Tran.

5. Further, upon the Court's execution of the [Proposed] Final Judgment Upon Consent and Permanent Injunction, Biogen will file a dismissal without prejudice as against Defendant Neurobiogen, thereby disposing of all parties and concluding the matter.

6. In light of the foregoing facts and the pending resolution of the dispute, the parties believe that it is unnecessary for the Court to hold the Case Management Conference, which they believe will ultimately become moot.

7. Accordingly, the parties have agreed that a continuance of the Case Management Conference in this action to July 17, 2015 is appropriate.

8. There have not been any previous time modifications in this case, either by stipulation or Court order.

9. If granted, this time modification is not expected to have any effect on the greater schedule for this case.

10. Accordingly, Biogen hereby respectfully requests that the Case Management Conference be rescheduled to July 17, 2015, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer