Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Soderling, 3:11-cr-00530-VC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150826990 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME FROM AUGUST 19, 2015 TO OCTOBER 26, 2015 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . Defendant Jay Scott Soderling, Defendant Jessica Lynn Soderling, and the United States of America, by and through undersigned counsel, appeared before the Court on August 19, 2015 for a motions hearing. The matter was re-set for trial on October 26, 2015. The parties respectfully request that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act between August 19, 2015 and Octo
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME FROM AUGUST 19, 2015 TO OCTOBER 26, 2015

Defendant Jay Scott Soderling, Defendant Jessica Lynn Soderling, and the United States of America, by and through undersigned counsel, appeared before the Court on August 19, 2015 for a motions hearing. The matter was re-set for trial on October 26, 2015. The parties respectfully request that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act between August 19, 2015 and October 26, 2015 for the reasons set forth in Defendant Jessica Lynn Soderling's Motion to Continue Jury Trial, filed on August 17, 2015 (Doc. # 99), and to allow defense counsel to review discovery and to prepare for trial.

Accordingly, Defendant Jay Scott Soderling, Defendant Jessica Lynn Soderling, and the United States of America hereby STIPULATE and AGREE that time under the Speedy Trial Act be excluded from August 19, 2015 and October 26, 2015 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) to allow for effective preparation of counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Respectfully submitted this 24th day of August, 2015,

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation of Defendant Jay Scott Soderling, Defendant Jessica Lynn Soderling, and the United States of America, the representations of counsel, and for good cause shown, the Court finds that failing to exclude the time between August 19, 2015 and October 26, 2015 would unreasonably deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between August 19, 2015 and October 26, 2015 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the Defendants in a speedy trial. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time between August 19, 2015 and October 26, 2015 shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer