Filed: Jan. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING ENE HEARING MAXINE M. CHESNEY , Senior District Judge . Plaintiffs and the City of Oakland respectfully request that the ENE hearing in this action be continued by two months. The ENE hearing was previously scheduled for January 6, 2016. On January 4, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Settlement with the San Leandro Defendants. Dkt. No. 52 (Jan. 4, 2016). Also, Plaintiffs and the City of Oakland are engaging in good-faith settlement discussions
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING ENE HEARING MAXINE M. CHESNEY , Senior District Judge . Plaintiffs and the City of Oakland respectfully request that the ENE hearing in this action be continued by two months. The ENE hearing was previously scheduled for January 6, 2016. On January 4, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Settlement with the San Leandro Defendants. Dkt. No. 52 (Jan. 4, 2016). Also, Plaintiffs and the City of Oakland are engaging in good-faith settlement discussions a..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING ENE HEARING
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs and the City of Oakland respectfully request that the ENE hearing in this action be continued by two months. The ENE hearing was previously scheduled for January 6, 2016.
On January 4, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Settlement with the San Leandro Defendants. Dkt. No. 52 (Jan. 4, 2016). Also, Plaintiffs and the City of Oakland are engaging in good-faith settlement discussions and exchanging documents to help facilitate those discussions. The parties discussed the proposed continuance with the ENE Evaluator. In addition, the parties are having regular status calls with the Evaluator.
Given these developments, the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the deadline to complete the ENE hearing to March 9, 2016.
ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION
I, David Pereda, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing documents. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from each of its Signatories.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
