Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VICERAL v. MISTRAS GROUP, INC., 3:15-cv-02198-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160112904 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jan. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiffs Edgar Viceral and David Krueger and Defendant Mistras Group, Inc., by and through their attorneys, MARLIN & SALTZMAN, SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP, and UNITED EMPLOYEES LAW GROUP, P.C. and LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. respectively, stipulate and agree to continue the deadline for completion of alternative dispute resolution, currently scheduled for March 24, 2016, to Apr
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE

Plaintiffs Edgar Viceral and David Krueger and Defendant Mistras Group, Inc., by and through their attorneys, MARLIN & SALTZMAN, SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP, and UNITED EMPLOYEES LAW GROUP, P.C. and LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. respectively, stipulate and agree to continue the deadline for completion of alternative dispute resolution, currently scheduled for March 24, 2016, to April 5, 2016.

WHEREAS, on November 24, 2015, the Parties appeared before the Court for their initial case management conference ("CMC");

WHEREAS, at the initial CMC the Parties agreed to submit this matter for private mediation before mediator Mark S. Rudy, Esq.;

WHEREAS, following the initial CMC, the Parties requested Mr. Rudy's availability for a private mediation;

WHEREAS, on November 30, 2015, Mark Rudy's office identified April 5, 2016, as Mr. Rudy's earliest availability for mediation;

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2015, the Parties reserved April 5, 2016, for private mediation;

WHEREAS, on December 4, 2015, the Parties filed a Joint Proposed Schedule Pursuant to November 24, 2015 CMC and Minute Order identifying that they intended to participate in private mediation before mediator Mark Rudy on April 5, 2015;

WHEREAS, on December 30, 2015, the Court issued its Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial, ordering alternative dispute resolution completed by March 24, 2016, twelve (12) days before the Parties' April 5, 2016 mediation date;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request a continuance of the deadline for completion of alternative dispute resolution, currently scheduled for March 24, 2016, to April 5, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, AND FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE STIPULATION FILED CONCURRENTLY AND ABOVE, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS:

A continuance of the deadline for completion of alternative dispute resolution, currently scheduled for March 24, 2016, to April 5, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer